just aim for the hull
Or the muzzle/barrel
You’ve gotta be smoking something if u think the PzH 2000 is a “post-WW2 MBT.”
That’s a concern? You sound like Gajin.
Yes, yes, and no.
I didn’t mean PZH 2000 is a MBT.
I was just bringing examples for light armoured tanks and it just slipped out.
For MBT i just meant Leopard I and M48
I didn’t mean PZH 2000 is a MBT
I was just bringing examples for lightly armoured tanks.
What if the hull isn’t in sight or the tank is angled Like most situations?
Kind of fun how even the terminator with “russian bias” got br up after a week and this thing still has the same br 3 month later after release while having insane stat:

aim below the gun
because if you aim properly, it can still be 1 shotted in the front, the bmpt cannot.
what is driver port??
Because the BMPT was literally added 2.0 below where it should be, whilst T58 can barely be considered too strong.
60% wr, 2+ kd = “barely be considered too strong” ? can i have whatever youre smoking?
You’re right, the EBR should move up again cuz good stats.
The PZH 2000 isn’t supposed to have armor. Why doesn’t anyone complain that it’s HE nukes any and all vehicles it can see?
Oh ok, the Panzerhoubitze also isn’t “post ww2” it is still used 2day.
t58 has far better stats than any of the ebrs so try again
You just defeated your own point XD. Stats don’t determine whether a vehicle should be moved or not, we saw that with the entire French TT. What determines whether a vehicle should be moved is its capabilities.
T58 has
- no stabilizer
- no LRF
- no thermals
- no sabot (and its main shell was recently nerfed)
- bad mobility
- massive recognizable silhouette
all in exchange for
- very firepower
- somewhat good armor
Seriously, anyone who somehow struggles to fight a T58 in a light tank meta BR is just bad.
ebr does fine at its br though, so you kinda proved my point thanks
T58 also has a 1 shot gun on a 2s reload which alone would put it at 8.3+ without even taking into account the turret armor