I believs the T designation is irrelevant. This is a good example of “cope”.
No its fine leave it alone
1 Like
The first rule of having the multiple accounts thatmanypplhave is to not tell the people who can ban your ass that you have multiple accounts.
3 Likes
Well, obviously Sybrite screwed up there.
I’m just confused cause there are thousands of non-actioned accounts.
Tell me you’ve never considered to find solutions around the vehicles you face without telling me directly.
3 Likes
This must be a bait……
Or a serious skill issue
2 Likes
You mean the OP did by admitting he has multiple accounts for himself. Guess what Gaijin will do to him now…….nothing.
Yeah bunny, don’t dig up dirt.
@ErnestKrauss629
Seriously man, take constructive criticism lightly. Even if you have 3 other level 50 accounts or whatever, that’s nowhere near the experience you’ll face with some people.
1 Like
Then you don’t care about help? We’re telling you that it has nothing to do with the vehicle itself, but the people playing it. Hell, I’ve seen an M22 kill a Tiger, and the Tiger player was a level 12. Would it make sense for that level 12 to have a pissy fit when they’re told that other people simply have more experience?
2 Likes
The tank was actually good, though. If there’s one thing the Soviets did right were the guns, at least during WW2. The tank is not even that strong anyway. It’s a one-shot kill for even solid shot. One thing that is not right however is the insane angled performances of the capped shells.
But I digress, if you get killed by one while in a Panther, Tiger, Jumbo etc. you’re doing something wrong
2 Likes
the last 8 years of T-34s bouncing shots that shouldnt bounce, or the fact how T-34s have access to artillery, when its a known fact most T-34s didnt have radios, and how a T-34 seems to be able to 1 shot everything.
1 Like
There’s only two ahistorical features of the T-34 in War Thunder.
Fuel tanks absorbing 100% of spalling from AP rounds and optics absorbing shells. Neither of these issues are unique to the T-34 but they are the most prevalent things about it that would make it “unbalanced”. Otherwise it’s a brick with an engine and a gun. Not bad, not stellar.
1 Like
Yes and no. The old saying goes, fool my once, shame on you, fool my twice, shame on me. In other words, the T-34 is great for some people, in our case of bad luck, the enemies, but when we play it, it’s utter garbage. You can keep going back to it to see it you can “lol-pen” German tanks, and shrug 8.8cm’s like, well, a tank. So, yes and no, it’s a very lol tank, but it doesn’t always do the greatest.
Historically, an utter garbage tank, saving grace being up-armrament and angled front plate. Literally written by one engineer, it would run 200km’s, and then require a total overhaul on the drivetrain. This can’t be modeled in war thunder, but you get my drift, and from what I’ve heard the guns proformance wasn’t stellar.
1 Like
yea they only seem powerful cause gaijin’s spaghetti code. The real issue everyone needs to look in to is tha abram’s gun. That everyone seems to ignore for some reason. People legit leak documents on Turret ROTATION and go to war on the smallest of things but never once the abram’s gun elevation. Ive made a post about it without leaking any documents and only using a public photo
I am not sure what point you are attempting to make. The tank has some trolly armour, but most of the time I have no issue one-shot them, as some players have already mentioned above. What about having no radio? Broken gun barrels should not be repaired in less than one minute in real life as well.
2 Likes
skill issue
2 Likes
skill issue
2 Likes
Mike Tyson says - “Thkill Ithew”. . . .
but in the OP’s defense, I find 57mm cannons in game(maybe the ammo?) are better than 75mms and sometimes even 76mm guns a great deal of the time. And also, I find when I use some planes/tanks they do not seem to perform as good as the same vehicles do against me . … this can be annoying … .lol.
But everyone plays differently and “results may vary” … there are always many things to consider, for every instance . . . this is the way.
If you’re in a tiger, there’s little you can do about it
Are you asking this, or stating?
145 is greater than 100?
Have you tried this useful little thing, called angling?
They are heavy tanks the same way an AMX-50 is a “heavy tank”. They are just overgrown mediums.
The only part on those american tanks that resemble armor is their turret. Not because it is well protected, but becuase volumetric is still awful.
The only part where they can pen are very small, and not guaranteed to hit.
They can easily be penned by a 75mm Sherman too. So what is your problem here?
And this is not a realistic game (despite being advertised as realistic). If it were realistic, then Sheridans and whatnot would just randomly explode in the match.
For 1, nobody uses solidshot in the russian tanks (they have it, but it is trash).
For 2, russian guns use APHE, which, you know, go boom after penetration.
You just sound very confused.
Also, D-25T, D-10, ML-20, and the BL guns would press X really ard to doubt. They are all better than a 17pdr.
You can (and should) get banned for that.
Btw, the T-34-75 is just a big pile of garbage. It trades flat pen for everything.
It has awful angle pen (despite the statcrad), “damage” that’s sometimes less than solidshot, horrible accuracy, and higher BR.