I really dont understand what make T32E1 7.7 and not 7.3, i enjoy 7.7 soviet and usa heavies but i dont see how can T32E1 be at the same br with IS-4M, it’s more comparable to a t44-100 or an is3, reload, penetration, mobilty even optics and weakspot, with the lfp weakspot(wich i think is bigger now than it was before?) It could be balanced in 6.3 fight
Or if it’s stay in 7.7 a reload rate buff would make it less useless in uptier(2 pieces munition were supposed to buff the realod rate, big problem with the T15E1 because of the small turret)
(Repost in the good channel)(i think)
1 Like
Gajin is goofy, and noobs complain that the T32 is overpowered and that the E1 is a significant buff.
Imo the T32 shouldn’t have been added. Gajin should have just added a single T32E1 at 7.3
1 Like
The E1 is nigh immune to every APHE shell it faces, aside from a pixel weakspot on its forehead and LFP. Unlike the T32, it does not have the LFP or MG port weakspot for 90% of APHE shells it faces. It is fine at 7.7.
3 Likes
Ok, let’s lower the abrams to 6.3 as well then, it has large weak spot you could pen in your Sherman if you want to balance off of weak spots alone without taking into account general armor characteristics
1 Like
It didnt before but it got one huge now, evry nation have a 6.3 tank that can pen that, and even if the weakspot didnt existed it’s the point of having heavy tank, it’s an equivalent to the tiger 2
Are you comparing mooving t32e1 from 7.7 to 7.3 to mooving abrams in 6.3? This is a fallacious argument, and a parody of what i said, it’s a 1945 heavy with similar capacibilities to is3, not even close to is4m
There are multiple topics about this already. It’s pointless to start this discussion again in a new thread.
If you’re whole argument that the IS-4M is somehow better then you’re wrong.
It’s also comparing apples to oranges as both have completely different strenghts and weaknesses.
T-44 is very mobile and all around balanced vehicles, except lacking firepower.
→ Can’t pen a Tiger II H from the front. (Actually you can but it’s quite difficult)
T-44-100 is similiar but has a whole lot more firepower, practically on the level as a Tiger II H.
→ Can’t pen a T32E1
But the T32E1 is also many times more mobile than the Tiger II, or the IS-4M.
1 Like
I understand that and it’s even seems logical that 1945 heavies like is4m and is 6 are in the same br but it would be forgeting that the reason t32e1 will never be as good/balanced as is4m is the teams and vehicle you play against and with, 7.7 is an intermediate between cold war and ww2, you will never plays purely 7.7 it’s always uptier or downtier and for that reason it’s bad, where is4 have no problems fighting leopard, m48 and m103 t32e1 simply cant keep up with t54, t55, a 0.7 uptier and you are useless, that tank relegated to the role of m103 backup
But i really understand if peoples dont like that idea let’s moove on