This time I provided patent documents from the Russian side, official documents from UAZ (Ural Heavy Machinery Manufacturing Plant), wall charts from the Russian armed forces regarding the T-series tanks, real-life photos of the ZTZ98 (the original name of ZTZ99) tank from the Chinese side, and an official catalog of the ZTZ96 tank. I am curious about how the administrator will label my report as’ not a bug 'this time.
autoloader position and mold piercing bugs on multiple vehicles // Gaijin.net // Issues
This may require you to provide server footage to prove the existence of the problem, and I personally speculate that it may be due to a lack of ammunition in the magazine of the Russian tank you hited.
I would add the links or provide the name of published works.
Just add another section to the end of your reports in the likes of
''Sources:
www.thisisanofficialsource,com ( source for this section )
TheBookOfSources, Author SourceMaestro, Page 242.‘’
etc,etc.
The official poster file is too large to fit in the bug report. I have uploaded it here.
All the issues I mentioned, including the position of the magazine, the correspondence between the top and roof of the hoist, and the correspondence between the actuator and the main gun, are reflected in these documents.
Not sure if I saw that or if I could see it in your bug report, if it was not you should definitely find a way to post it, otherwise I doubt they will give it the time of say.
I have attached the source files and taken screenshots of their covers. As for the source of the photos of the interior of the vehicle, I saved them from the photos released at the Ural factory a long time ago. Specifically, before the special military operation, photos and videos of the T-90M’s internal structure are not uncommon as promotional materials due to the war. Many of them can prove the position relationship between the loader and the roof. I will try to find the publishing links of these videos and provide them as much as possible (although I think it is not necessary)
Source about Chinese tanks are much less, and the internal photos are mostly taken from military reports on CCTV. These materials have not been recorded on video, unfortunately, I can only provide screenshots
It’s a shame because gaijin more often than not, or rather, some of their mods.
Instantly disregard 90% well written and sourced reports if 10% can’t be backed up.
This is obviously bullshit as 90% is still sourced, but there are hundreds of reports some that have not been responded to in years which is obviously tragic as we are not getting good changes implemented and stupid bugs or oversights are left in.
We just have to be persistent and thorough.
I think the biggest problem is still the incompetence of their management personnel. During the old forum period around 2020, we could see which administrators replied to our reports and provide more detailed information for them to discuss. However, after the new bug report area became independent, administrators actually had tremendous power that did not require discussion with players. They could even ignore a large number of reports or unjustifiably reject bugs and close these reports, while players could not argue with them and developers could not receive timely feedback. Numerous bugs, big or small, have been lingering in the game, leaving players powerless. The managers of these bug reports are like the Berlin Wall, isolating the channels for ordinary players and developers to discuss.
1 Like
Unfortunately, it has gone downhill, and i don’t really know what to do with that, i doubt gaijin will actually hire more competent personel to actually go through the reports
1 Like
I hope they can pay more attention to it. Warthunder has had many incidents of military secrets being leaked, and these situations are closely related to their management being indifferent and not accepting player feedback. Their bug report management has the power of a dictator to judge whether the sources provided by players are “trustworthy”. In cases where information second only to military secrets cannot be used, players will of course further provide completely authoritative and official military secrets as materials. Unfortunately, I have not seen any major changes in this regard so far. They only casually tell players not to provide military secrets, and there is still no change in responding to player feedback.
1 Like
Bad news, my bug report has been closed again and they still says’ not a bug ‘.
Let’s see what the administrator said:
Obviously, this’ manager 'had no idea what kind of bug I was reporting and was not interested in understanding, so he decided to close the report. This is the true portrayal of gaijin’s bug report management area now. That’s it, I’ll give up. I won’t file a bug report about it anymore, after all, no one will take it seriously in this fkn company.
Bad news, the administrator still insists that there is no problem with the location. All the photos and source screenshots I provided were not accepted.They closed all of my reports and labeled them as not a bug. Comrades, our efforts have failed.It seems that they will only admit this bug after modeling the torsion bar suspension of these vehicles.
you mean UVZ? UVZ is tank manufacturer while UAZ just makes trucks
my bad,it’s UVZ
1 Like
After my detailed bug report regarding the position issue of the autoloader for the T-series tank was inexplicably rejected, Gaijin decided to add a basket to the NATO tank and count it all as turret horizontal drive. It must be said that this is also very ironic, and it is difficult not to doubt their bias.
It’s quite ironic, isn’t it? Perhaps this is the typical operating model of a Russian company? I’ don’t know.
This is even a historical issue rather than a balance issue, but it is still not recognized. I don’t even think this is a substantial nerf of Russian tanks, or even a kind of buff? At least if this issue is fixed, the area of ammunition exposed to LFP from the front will be reduced a little bit.
Look who is biased