T-90 series autoloader position bug

At present, there are some issues with the position of the T-90 series autoloader, as their position overlaps with the space of the torsion bar, and the top of the loader is not connected to the ejection window, which has caused some problems.

Firstly, taking the T-90A as an example, it can be seen that in the area that should have been crossed by the torsion bar suspension, the magazine and ammunition were mistakenly filled in the game.


And this is a cross-sectional view of the T-72B, it can be seen that the position of the autoloader is directly pressed above the torsion bar suspension, and cannot be inserted into the interior of the torsion bar suspension.

Then, through the front edge baffle of the magazine, we can also determine that there is an issue with the position of the T-90 magazine.Here we use the internal photos of the T-90M as evidence, which shows that the front baffle of the ammunition depot is slightly lower than the top plate of the magazine.
image

But in the game, the front panel of the magazine completely covers the magazine, and while the top panel of the magazine is lower than the front panel, the bottom of the magazine even exceeds the lower edge of the front panel.


As a comparison, the position of the T-72B’s magazine in the game is correct. The magazine top is higher than the front panel.

Next is the top position of the autoloader’s hoist, which is still described in the internal photo of the T-90M. In the photo, the top end of the hoist is directly in contact with the roof of the car, closely attached to the ejection window((The CITV base of the commander in the red circle on the left confirms that this photo is from inside the T-90M).
image

At the same time, T-72’s sectional views also prove this point: the top of the hoist should be closely attached to the top of the vehicle and the ejection window.

However, in the game, whether it is T-90A or T-90M, the position of the hoist is relatively low, and there is still a distance between it and the roof of the turret.



Obviously, this is not in line with reality.

In summary, there is a problem with the positioning of the autoloader for the T-90 series tanks in the game, which is significantly lower, and the positions of the ammunition and members inside the turret are also lower because of this. This has a certain impact on the consistency and realism of vehicles in the same series in the game. In terms of game balance, when hitting T-90 series tanks from the side (especially the T-90M with spall liner), there may be a problem of not being able to hit the ammunition depot that should have existed. This has led to disputes over “Russian bias” and “skill issues”.

T-90 series autoloader position bug // Gaijin.net // Issues
The report has been submitted in the bug area for several months, but still has not received a response. I hope it is accepted as soon as possible for repair. This is not difficult because the T-72 has the correct internal structural position.
If you have any questions, please feel free to raise them below.

13 Likes

Please note that this issue only pertains to the historical inaccuracies present in the game. Adjusting the position of the magazine and autoloader will not significantly improve the gameplay experience of these vehicles. They will only move upwards to the same position as the T-72. Please do not argue about the “Russian bias” issue in the game below this post.

6 Likes

+1 on your report

2 Likes

Hopefully this will get the attention of gaijin, best of luck!

3 Likes

Thank you for your reply. The administrators in the official bug report area always ignore player reports. I think Gaijin really needs to improve their bug report processing speed.

1 Like

I don’t know if this post will catch the attention of the administrator, but I really hope they can fix this type of issue as soon as possible. There are too many similar problems in the game, and Gaijin’s review of bug reports is completely inefficient.

1 Like

another update but ignored my issue :(

they probably read it but just do not care to accept. Perhaps, try to make a different, more clickbait title to gain other mods’ attention. I didn’t try too hard to get OCC 90-62 shell name fixed but eventually they made it.

1 Like

No use.I can only hope that the forum administrator can help pay attention to this issue now. The bug report section did not play its due role at all. I’ve been submitting reports about this bug for about 7 months now and have submitted more than 5 of them, but Gaijin has been ignoring it and never responded to it.