wether you agree or not is irrelevant it statistically is the best 10.7 due to the combination of high firepower, armour and mobility.
The ERA on the T64B, T80B, T72AV Turms which this thread is on, T72B all have a whopping. Five militers of kinetic protection.
The ERA cannot stop low BR darts never mind the higher BR ones at 10.3 / 10.7.
it most certainly is for most Russian tanks bar the ones with the Top tier ERA which can be found on only a handfull of tanks.
Being T72B3, T90M, T80BVM and I think maybe another T72 though I do not use them often.
The T80U ERA giving 120mm protection is about right last I checked into it, same as the chinese ERA.
T72AV turms which this post is about, get’s one tapped through the UFP by L23A1, a round which is worse the DM23 120MM.
Which as someone astutely pointed out to me, has worse penetration as well as post penetration as DM33 found at 9.3.
Secondly, Russian vehicles at 10.3 / 10.7 even up until the T72B3 or B3A, have extremely slow gun handling, T80U has a whopping 4 degrees a second, compared to say an abrams 20 odds.
Weak points are extremely easy to hit, you shouldn’t need “take the time to aim” as you should already be expecting a T72, T80, etc not blinding rushing in which at that point it’s irrelevant if it’s a soviet or NATO tank.
Russian tanks are absolutely worse in CQC ? they have worse optics for the most part, worse reload bar on the 64 and 80B, even then they have piss gun handling, and poor turret / tank traverse in comparison with NATO counterparts.
They most certainly are, if you have ever used a russian MBT , which going by this I’ll assume not.
What? lol, Leopard 2K should move to 10.3 as wlel that shit is wildly strong still.
120MM gun with the same round found at 10.7, great optics, fantastic mobility, trolly turret armour as well as a 20mm auto cannon?
the low level russian ERA is not a black hole.
I’d consider an overall winrate of 56 percent and 1.0KD average as hell tbh