Instead of arguing the TURMS should be a lower BR because its worse than the T-80UD, perhaps instead we should be arguing theT-80UD should just be a higher BR?
I dont see reason why UD/BE couldnt sit at 11.0, seeing as standard 80U sits at 11.7.
1 Like
Swedish T-80U exists at 11.3 with much better acceleration, top speed and an actual reverse speed… while still retaining thermals (albeit not great thermals).
I mean that’s true, though you’d have to increase the T-64B too.
I see no downside to that.
Then its good UD/BE could sit 0.3 below it, no?
I’m not sure if that’s valid, but I mean it could as well be.
I guess so.
The TURMS has been oppressive for years, now it’s finally at a respectable br, it doesnt need the get up or down.
Spoiler
The 2S38 in the other hand… a good 11.0 should be fine
1 Like
people are just making stuff up in these threads now
3 Likes
Yeah, how about no ?
As a perfect all-rounder it should go up, anyone should be able to admit that, if not it’s just skill issue
1 Like
Typical Motorola wanting to keep OP soviet stuff OP. Literally 0 surprise there
Yeah, doesn’t surprise me too
1 Like
Yes, it could go up to 10.7 with recent decompression.
It going up to 11.0 was the problematic part.
Only OP to people that struggle to penetrate TURMS’ UFP with L26.
1 Like
Was a monster before the BMPT/BMPT-72 release and now is the BMPT/BMPT-72 dominate 10.7-11.7 br.
1 Like
Looks like its going up :D
2 Likes
But it has “bad reverse gear!”. You see, Russian tanks getting 150mm+ pen while also having higher survivability.
Because the T-90A and T-72B3(arena) sit there that perform much better.