Pretty sure that incident prove the contrary. That Bradley gun its useless against T-90M… Yea it took it optics and this its one of the main concern with tank like Armata. But Only the crew of tank know what happens with the turret. That T-90 was hit by 3 FPV drone. The turret spinning was argue to be the dmg of the First FPV not the two Bradley fire… If the Bradley would have dmg the turret ring it would be stuck not spinning like it did… The 3 crew walking away of the tank after the second FPV hit the Engine bay, so that pretty much confirm that the M2 autocannon was ineffective at penetrating the T-90. Because as Western said the inside of Russian tank are really cramped. There is not way it would have penetrate the tank and don’t fatally injure the crew.
Also Relikt its difference to k5. Usually every plate of K-5 has more stopping power than one of Relikt. But Relikt can be sandwich…
+1, people are just apprehensive because of years of BVM and B3 domination but now the situation isn’t the same, even though Russia still has best CAS+SPAA combo.
It’s the logical next step when gaijin decides to add unmanned turret mbts.
I’m not sure, I don’t see anything visually different other than being repainted for the parade in the city of Kazan. Then again, I don’t know much of the T-14 Armata’s changes over the years beyond this suggestion.
