If Israel is terrible, what would you even call Iran tree?
2 Likes
Iran also has an arms industry which is expanding very quickly. Switzerland’s arms industry is actually shrinking because of their refusal to allow exports to Ukraine.
Besides, Iran was one example, my first choice is Korea which simply blows Switzerland out of the water.
Ah yes, lets ignore the part where I said “high tier”, of course you would. Isn’t your entire shtick simply ignoring that the nations you advocate for are dead-end trees?
Lmao, get over yourself. As @Godvana already stated, Switzerland has no vehicles that can compete with others at higher trees, and smashing them with Austria won’t help either, as that’s yet another country stuck with the 10.3 Leopard 2A4 as its highest BR vehicle.
Not quite sure how the Cascavel you cited counts as high-tier, but sure, keep moving the goalpost
Moving the goalposts hahaha. I said it straight up that it’s about higher tiers, you’re the only one moving goalposts. Oh wait, didn’t Godvana mention it already?
Yea he did. You just ignored it.
2 Likes
talk about ignoring stuff…
I was just looking at the linked ground tech tree… from rank 1 to 3 there is not a SINGLE medium tank.
It’s mostly just light tanks with 20mm autocannons lmao
that’s a fair criticism, but at least there is a rank I-III
1 Like
Due to Switzerland’s geographical characteristics, it was armed only with light tanks during World War II.
It would be better for the tree to start at rank 4. Starting trees at rank 4 is a good idea except it was done terribly with Israel.
1 Like
again, would only matter if gajin would care about ranks which dont make them money
Israel is a half-tree and has a quick grind to high tier, i sure wonder how popular it is
1 Like
If Switzerland was added it would have the exact same issues as Israel, and would therefore be just as unpopular…
the main reason for that one is that gajin didnt add any auxilary tanks like lights yet and neither did they add a top tier spaa yet. The problem is what gajin added to the tree not that it started at rank 4
3 Likes
Not very, and it isn’t really due to how quickly you can grind it. It’s more to do with the fact it doesn’t have many prospects for growth (wow, just like Switzerland, who would’ve thought!). Can’t wait for my 17th Leopard 2A4 to be added to the game ngl, maybe it will even have cardboard add-on armour.
Same with BeNeLux tbh, would be a dead-end TT before long.
1 Like
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmkay.
As soon as you find her warships and helicopters, such as Apache, Eurocopter or Mi-28
1 Like
TL:DR everyone agrees Switzerland has unique stuff and could function as an independent tree, just people disagree on whether it’s better or worse than some other options and base their positive or negative attitude on it.
Thanks for my ted talk
3 Likes
There’s no need for every nation to have a naval tree. Though a lack of any armed helicopters would be a hindrance to Swiss ground forces, I still think Swiss air and ground trees would be worthwhile. With or without Austria as a subtree.
2 Likes
Swiss EKW could be on Sweden Rank II attacker tbh. I know you want the tree of its own, but it’s too impractical. Just… Just not a new tree. The Plane in Swedish tree can get the Swiss flag and hopefully new voice lines, at best. I’d rather have the vehicles, but not a tech tree with only 1 or 2 indigenous designs. They didn’t even release a Benelux tree, and the Dutch aircraft are on different trees at this point. I actually think they should make a Benelux tree, but damn, swiss is a neutral country with next to no original vehicles. I know I offended some of you by saying “no original designs” but damn, you can’t just make an Israel tree with no jets.