And there we have it ,two enemies who came together to reach an agreement that is sensible and constructive.I would welcome both versions and I am sure it would see a return of former players to the game…
1 Like
Damn he likes everything you post now on the instant you post it… That shows desperation to try hide that issue they been pushing…
1 Like
I have used air and still using it, that is how I know what its strong and weak sides are, and that is also why I know what is effective against it and what is not.
I really liked the tests of ‘advance’ mode, where in order to spawn into air vechicle, player really needed to gather a lot of SP. It showed how CAS is really effective and that game can work without it.
3 Likes
Silly ass argument. SPAA does not work. You are off topic.
1 Like
Are you trying to win for yourself or trying to sort out an issue to make the game better? Sarcasm and banter can be funny in debate vocally but it rarely translates in written text and an argument is lost the minute one deviates from the point.I found this the hard way.
Absolutely not off-topic… The off-topic was coining my stats to dismiss even TRYING to use SPAA, based on the KDR of someone who ‘knows’ them, yet proclaims they’re ineffective…
Yep. Off topic. Zero to do with SPAA being effective or not.
1 Like
So if someone with good stats on SPAA (which by Your opinion doesn’t need to be there in order for player to be useful for the team) says to You that SPAA still is ineffective, You won’t belive them… because?
It does.
The same can be said about the coining of KDRs in ‘discussion’, and abuse can merely be played off as banter, or shielding for abuse, because the fact of it being ignored is a problem…
After all, my KDR doesn’t matter as the discussion is about the thread, not how well someone interprets those stats, and how well they deem someone to be a player of the game…
Especially when new players see this ‘fighting’ and think that they have a point, not the person who’s saying to use the features and vehicles they have at thier disposal.
Nope. Any decent pilot runs trains on SPAA players of any and all variety. Top tier is especially bad with how useless any missile spaa is rn
CAS should be a real treat in order to not be game destroying for tankers in GRB.
Allied airpower in WW2 was used to be game destroying for the Axis and it was but it was not fun for those on the ground :)
I’ve already mentioned this. GRB should have Forward Operating Bases (FOB) for ground forces, where they’re somewhat protected from spawn killing, can re-arm, repair and could potentially have guns that are AI or player controlled to defend them.
CAS can freely leave the battlefield free of almost all threats to repair and rearm, but ground forces (supposedly the star of the show) can only do this at cap zones. These zones being highly contested and basically act as ‘shoot here’ markers for CAS.
2 Likes
And a decent SPAA user won’t be targetted at the outset…
Didn’t even mention targetting. You’re a joke.
You wouldn’t need SPAA in a CAS free Game
Would like that in game, the said FOB should also allow You to j-out of the vechicle without the ‘death penalty’ like aircraft can do on airport.
2 Likes
‘Training your guns on a target’ is what I thought you were meaning, but do you often ‘train’ against static, non-functioning SPAA?
Sounds dumb.
As in, RUN A TRAIN ON SOMEBODY, google it im not your dad
That’s nothing to do with the statement made or replied to.