SuperHind (Mk.4) Discussion - Specifications, Weaponry, etc

Machinery of War Discussion Helicopter
84

I guess so, although the Super Hind should still be able to carry Igla.

1 Like
85

also the main “counter argument” that i’ve seen is that, there is no picture of it / it doenst look like it has x in the pic… but according to the brochure it does/ its capable, which way the devs usually take on things like this ?

86

Dev’s are not the one whom do bug reports. That’s what Tech Mods do. They forward the missing weapon to Dev’s, and Dev can decide if it can be added or not. Sometimes weapons can be rejected even though it can be carried because of cases like BR increase or that it’s simply too powerful for now.

1 Like
87

i see…
I hope gaijin decides to add them. that heli with those armament would be perfect at 11.3 imo, or heck it would be just fine with some a2a option at its current br

88

you deserve the electric chair

1 Like
89

I can not find it now, mind please directing me to the guide on what documentation format is acceptable?

2 Likes
90

Any documentation is fine unless its classified I think

1 Like
91

so the mokopa got passed but mistral not despite using the same brochure?

1 Like
92

There are different brochures also saying that there is a choice of guided weapons, so it’s most likely that.

1 Like
93

I think I saw that but they don’t really specify do they right?

1 Like
94

Yea, but it does have the ability to guide them. (As well as some sites mentioning it too)

1 Like
95

ok, but not the same for mistral I assume

2 Likes
96

Yup, aside from mentioning that it has “air to air full spectrum”, but no idea what that means, but I guess it means atleast that it does have some sort of air defense

1 Like
97

So what I have has a distribution clause on it so guess that will be a no go. Though I have learned that Denel also had a hand in it with ATE. I have sent a data request to Denel, doubtful they will even read the mail.

3 Likes
98

maybe we can just get iglas then

2 Likes
99

thats what we are hoping for

100

i think as long as it had some sort of proof that an a2a solution was installed on the aircraft it should be valid source, pictures or videos would be perfect, writing would have a lesser chance

1 Like
102

also ItsFilthy can you share them regardless ? now im just curious about it lol

103

Thats not a good thing to say.

104

? did i say something wrong ?