I would be fine with a BM with R-77-1 + R-33S and L-150M-01 this update
1 Like
well the @Panther2995 besides the seeker gimbal the Pl-10 is straight up worse than the r-74m not even the r-74m2
1 Like
why?
less range the same pull
If I remember correctly, the R-74M has an identical engine to the R-73
that is, the kinetic range remained the same
the kinetic range being the same dosent mean that the r-73 can lock onto a target at that range
This was most likely achieved through the new seeker
and as a result increasing the range the r-74m can be fired at
imho it’s useless with identical kinematics(in WT)
At the same time, the brochures showed a range of 30 km
Huh.
I wonder how come they managed to copy IRIS-T design and made it worse.
what i posted is part of an 80s east german document
it is entirely possible that the motor even for the r-73 changed whenever they started marketing it for export in the late 90s and 2000s
ontop of that it is impossible for the r-73 and r-74m to have the same kinematics even with the same motor since the r-74m has clipped wings and thus less drag
in what?
range and seeker gimbal
irist have 25km, irist < r73?
What gimbal of Iris?
I didn’t know about this
±90°
Do you know what of gimbal in the EF-2000 helmet?