nah they went too fast because of chinas super engines and the bent the rudders back
We debated this before and I think someone posted a shot from expo market about PL-10.
the chinese have a habbit of not putting any performance numbers there
performance = yes
Not this one.
The post that had the photograph was taken directly from spec section on slide.
In fact the person who posted that did it after you asked the same thing.
Flanker of Theseus type airplane
it is to the point where even wikipedia dosent list any numbers
The IIR seeker may track targets +/-90 degree off boresight angles.
It may be slaved to a helmet-mounted display (HMD)
The missile may lock-on after launch (LOAL)
Wikipedia?
Ck ck ck.
The mysterious and elusive ecm suites of both planes could be the difference.
Who said we’re talking about WT Ron?
I was referring to real life.
Same here as well.
wikipedia will take anything as a source
that is the point
Wikipedia heavily depends on user input, if no one didn’t bother to release even half baked specs it can do nothing.
Meanwhile PL-10’s specs already posted on this from upon your same question, remember that.
I like how little info the average Chinese modern fighter have so suggestions just look like this:
AESA: yes
Performance: yes
WS-10B
4 Likes
Chinese mf’s be like: wassup guys, yes this plane has AESA and RWR.
1 Like
now we know everything
like its range and seeker gimbal limits
Not that one.
The one that was posted was mentioning about seeker gimbal limits,range and more detailed informations.
Not this one as well.
Damn it, its been so long since that shot was posted, i could just remember which thread it was shared I could go back there to find it.
Go to advanced settings in the search bar, put your name, put the word pl10 performance and then look it up
1 Like
even then the claims i have seen ppl make are not any better than what we know for the r74m2
