wikipedia will take anything as a source
that is the point
wikipedia will take anything as a source
that is the point
Wikipedia heavily depends on user input, if no one didn’t bother to release even half baked specs it can do nothing.
Meanwhile PL-10’s specs already posted on this from upon your same question, remember that.
I like how little info the average Chinese modern fighter have so suggestions just look like this:
AESA: yes
Performance: yes
WS-10B
Chinese mf’s be like: wassup guys, yes this plane has AESA and RWR.

now we know everything
like its range and seeker gimbal limits
Not that one.
The one that was posted was mentioning about seeker gimbal limits,range and more detailed informations.
Not this one as well.
Damn it, its been so long since that shot was posted, i could just remember which thread it was shared I could go back there to find it.
Go to advanced settings in the search bar, put your name, put the word pl10 performance and then look it up
even then the claims i have seen ppl make are not any better than what we know for the r74m2

So, chances of seeing SM2 countermeasure report or RWR report in tomorrow’s dev-server, is it mastodontical cope?
Mig-29m va su-30sm2 countermeasure report race for first to be implemented
we dont even have a trailer and you already talk about dev?
Winner is mig-31 with an additional 40 large calibre countermeasures somehow
Indeed good sir, because teaser is tonight 100%
Aren’t teasers usually Friday?
Mig-31bm this update
Dev server is usually on Friday, while teaser is the day before (usually thursday’s)
Interceptor bingo list for September update:
i hope you have a good info and not just tons of copium, good sir