Full course while in the clouds.
That would be Su-34 crew. Fellas even have a heater inside iirc
Su-34 is a whole family camper, just missing the shower.
4 Likes
They could probably fit one inside by ditching some of the avionics.
1 Like
I mean, just imagine after your mission, you eat your tasty meal with this insane view.
5 Likes
Hey, I think there is some problem with the ER, can anyone confirm it is not a mass hallucination?
1 Like
So… (Failed Export mod Su32 (Su34)) What is that R27 doing there and did they just decide later they didnt want it there?
It’s a mockup, so there is no real proof it the pylon is wired for R-27. Plus Su-34 was (and still somewhat is) in development hell so some features couldve been scrapped when transitioned from prototypes to mass production version. Some people even say that radar could not even guide A2A missiles to begin with
yeah modern su-34e brochures only list r-74m as only air to air missile that it can carry, but su-34s in syria carried r-27er so I’m confused
like why carry a missile in a warzone that it cannot guide.
makes no sense
There could be a difference between avionics of export and domestic versions of Su-34.
Also you know Russia, changing characteristics of something without being bothered to change designation. And there is also a question of radars, I still don’t know what radar Su-34s are using - V-004 or Sh-141
1 Like
Yeah, just strange they would do this to a downgraded version, what would be the reason to export better than domestic product even if it was in a ‘prototype’ stage
There is a Su34M… and Su34ME (Export) - apparently export mod getting coold drip like LED lights on gear… Apparently it gets better ‘internals’, i assumed better engines to simplify production
1990 (2008) → 2024 Su34
1994 → 2000~ Su32
2024+ Su34M/ME (something along 12planes per year)
Reminds me how 9.31 from 90s and 9.41 from 2000s not being same hmm, i guess it takes Sukohoi kinda of guy to not change a thing from 90s to 2008, why change what is already perfect /s
SU-27 and SU-33 are somewhat obsolete right now.
Any 13.0 without ARH missiles actually.
Su34 were shown on multiple occasions equiped with r77. Even the red ones.
But who knows what russian are doing.
Yeah gaijin fucked up nuclear thunder big time redfor can just spawn in Kh-31PD carriers and quite literally neutralize all NATO mid-long range SAMS in under 3 minutes, and then have free reign at altitude. Meanwhile the Buk intercepts NATO ARMs with far more reliability and is vastly more lethal to planes. This match I was playing SEAD/CAP and I repeatedly blew up the AN/TPS-59s on respawn, Spyders + SAMP/T without dying a single time (that death was me trying to nuke toss in Su-24M without realizing gaijin removed CCRP on them for some reason).
1 Like
Still frames will drop (rtx 5080)
2 Likes
I love how most people don’t know how to use modern jets on a map that actually allows them to be flown the way they were meant to be high and fast. Instead, they fly low, thinking “multipath” will save them from an R-77 fired at Mach-Jesus from 30 or 40 km away. Ah, Su-35 radarI love you, Irbis.
3 Likes
it took them 3 years to learn multipathing it will take another 3 to forget it
It never should have existed… if Nuclear Thunder were permanent, or if Air Realistic Battle maps were the same size as or larger than the Nuclear Thunder ones, it would be much better; I didn’t even need to use chaff or notch. I could just turn and use my energy to outrun the missile.
F-15Es are dangerous cookies in this mode, guys focus on them. I didn’t see a single Rafale lol, your mighty Mica missile is useless here.
Bruh wut?
I was getting 2+ kills consistently yesterday in my Su-33, its still a beast in its current br.
2 Likes