holy saturation
huh, so 77M has completely different wing profile compared to R-77, longer but quite narrower.
Missile diameter looks slightly chonkier, and yeah definitely lenghtier, wonder when some more performance data will be available.
That aside, with this we could have some nice loadout mix in WT, basically a missile for every range.
If we will get it. Chances are that “R-77-1 performs well enough, according to our statistics” while everyone else will get their C-7/Ds and Meteors
C-7 is the same as c-5 with maybe slightly better trajectory shaping and eccm. First real upgrade is 120 d
Well, according to some US mains it supposed to be godslayer tier missile or something. That’s why i consider it equal to 77M
I am guessing when they make reference they are comparing to the current C-7.
Well, i might be wrong but from what i found in the internet - all bells and whistles that C-7 brings are pretty much meaningless in current WT meta.
1 Like
It is in WT RN so they do know what it does, which is the same issue with C-5: it should be better, but cause balance brought in by the fact that people for no reason asked for it on EF and 15E, it has to be kept this way.
1 Like
Can’t wait to get that shoved up my…-
Engines.
3 Likes
Should notch instead of showing it ur 6-o’clock xd
but my TVC brings all the boys to the yard. And I’m like, “it’s better than yours”
Also it’s called going cold, liberal. Back in MY DAY we could outrun missiles. /j
Also I love the name
3 Likes
aight it was going to have l-150 if in serial production
A very smooth name!
1 Like
yeah that is one of the perks of having lift
Is that Su-30 mod on DCS equipped with AL-41’s?
No.
If it’s the one by CodenameFlanker (Which I assume it is since that’s the most popular), it only has versions of the Su-30 with the AL-31s.
- Su-30SM.
- Su-30MKI.
- Su-30MKA.
- Su-30MKM.