I have to add, multiple bug reports in a single report is always being rejected
They have nagged me in the past for including multiple separate bug reports on aircraft instead of combining them into one, but they change their minds three times a day about that kind of thing.
It makes it easier on developers and yourself if you make it separate rather than including 5 different things on one report and then devs fix 4/5, miss one and conclude the report is fixed.
until they complain about it cuz they donβt want to nerf said vehicle (Gripen)
Does anyone know if the R-77-1 seeker should be more countermeasure resistent like the Mica?
And if there are any reports up for it.
Currently with arh missiles their seekers are made to be consistent with each other for balancing reasons, and generally MICA got better seeker for worse range, the rest basically has slightly worse seeker, and then the AIM54 series got even worse cause they get a lot of low tier scenarios.
Yeah I understand that, but what I was actually asking is if the seeker performance is close to IRL or if itβs far from it.
The balancing decision of making the seekers perform the same makes sense ofc.
if that was the case then derby/R-darter would also have better seeker
True. But Gaijin is Gaijin.
Non of the missiles are close to IRL figures. R-77-1 is probably furthest away from IRL figures.
Fair enough, thanks.
how much better is this compared to the current seeker in game?