4 Likes
We men just never grow up ha ha
1 Like
Not enough, give it bol pods
1 Like
well, all of this technically can be Flare/Chaff rounds
and it seems gaijin picked 400 countermeasures number becuase of this.
1 Like
That wont be the new aesa radar for vks service su35s
It will look more like byelka than zhuk, and will have a swivel
Just a reminder flanker radars are made by niip, not kret
The hmd is interesting tho
1 Like
Why would be a VKS service radar on international expo?
I know that, but this isn’t about this radar
This is also nothing new
Also, NIIP is a part of KRET
Like how irbis was shown??
Irbis or Irbis-E?
Potato and slightly spoiled potato ahh
1 Like
Maybe for the sake of War Thunder - sure, but irl there’s plenty of classified shit about radars that would even bringing a prototype on international expo undesirable
1 Like
First time trying the clanker with ray tracing, gotta say the 1st person view is peak. (ignore the jet textures tweaking sometimes)
Spoiler
Also some Tu-95 cause why not
https://youtu.be/bqDftezH_dU?si=OQm22zMivNevDxPQ
2 Likes
su27sm acceleration is underperforming hard
based on su35 acceleration data (my beloved brochure tuning, helo ef2000/rafale/jas)
we can see su30sm2 and su27sm has same engine curve
su27 with same tw/r as su35
has 600-1100 kmh acceleration by 17s expect 13.8
1100-1300 - 12 s expect 8
btw su27sm sustained turn must be much more then basic su27
current diffirence is only 0.2g
can anyone calculate how much
Same as Su-27
But isn’t AL-41 based off of AL-31s? If so that would probably explain why Gaijin kept the curve the same for the 31, 31-M1, and 41.
The Su-27SM isn’t the same as the Su-35S.
The Su-30SM2 has very similar weight to the Su-35S (only about 200kg diff.
And the Acceleration curves aren’t the same for the Su-27SM and Su-30SM2
acceleration depends of TWR and drag
su27sm has same drag as su35 at 0 aoa
with same twr and same mass its should accelerate same time
no, its based on al-41f but in game it has same curve
This is like saying that AIM-120D is based on AIM-120A so they should have same motor performance.
AL-41F-1 takes developments and knowledge from AL-41F, AL-31F and AL-37F alongside new technology. Having similar thrust curve is obviously possible, but it is pure baseless speculation
1 Like
Shouldnt variable bypass allow al41f1s to have a much better thrust curve compared to al31?
F1 doesn’t have variable bypass iirc, only AL-41F had it. It was ditched due to complexity and cost iirc
1 Like
Wait I thought AL-37 was just AL-31FP?
That sounds like a good enough source for gaijin’s standards.
Is the TWR on the Su-27SM the same as the Su-35S?
I assume the drag of the Su-35S should be lower, since i remember reading it has aerodynamic improvements.