lmao send more
Im waiting until thread becomes more quiet.
Patience is the key ehehehehehe.
Well, I guess we wait for the managers to respond
i think it would be better to make a new report
edit:
here is a better report
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/bARrK31aDuv7
Community Bug Reporting System - N011 family of radars wrong number of TWS ESA targets
Community Bug Reporting System - Su-30SM2 N035E wrong Search zone
2 more from digod
15 is correct for the early version of the radar that the su-30mkm has. Su-30sm though would probably have the one with 25.
Imo though both planes should just be the same in game, it’s just semantics. (Both should just get 25)
(Old brochure for bars, outdated)

If only someone would try making a report about how it shouldn’t have Irbis…
Even if it’s likely a futile endeavour…
Can’t see the Sora logo 🥲
thats because that version was the most advanced before the AI sloop was released to the common public to make people mock AIs and for us to be secretly controlled by Elon Musk, we are living in a psy ops and Fulcrum E is 200% correct


the range 350-400 km at 3m rcs is marketing lie
in the video the radar is supposedly being tested against something around 0.76m² of frontal rcs btw, I doubt it a little, but I’ve never seen anything different from that
source?
Might as well be marketing lie.
Only 350km for a specific scan zone 10x10 with long dwell time while the normal mode is 200km.
While bars is already 120ish km for the same target in normal mode.
Just noticed the Fullback is the only Flanker without a model update, well it probably required a bit more work tbf.
I just wish they gave it R-77-1. It’d be a beast (I only play it in sim) even if they put it at 13.7
the Fullback is not a Flanker, it is a Fullback
Irbis is a less than 2x performance improvement over bars using similar scan modes/like for like comparisons
Can’t wait for fully detailed toilet


