T-10KUB-1 isn’t related to Su-32? Su-32 was an early designation/export designation for Su-34 which was quickly scrapped?
You’re right, it’s the naval cousin to the Su-34 or would’ve been.
“Cousin” is very generous for a twin seater trainer that didn’t even have electro-optical equipment nor much plans for actual strike capabilities…
My god…
I-34,
I can’t believe they added Interstates to the game.
1 Like
French man showing the 13.7 flankers getting even better now
2 Likes
Al-41F-1*
F-1, F-1S it don’t matter ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
500kgf thrust difference matters :p
(It’s just T-10KUB-1 btw, different pic angle)
i love how he calls the su-27sm the blue plane lmao
4 Likes
my man luque13 is back again to slander on Russian tech? Love the guy
1 Like
It actually matters a lot. And not just in 500kgf of thrust. Engines have significantly different control system which also changes efficiency quite significantly. For someone who was giga pissed about SM2 radar and engines being incorrect, saying that difference between F-1 and F-1S don’t matter is… interesting to say the least
I’m not sure that it is going for 177. Su-57E most likely gonna use it, but domestic version probably still pursues Izd 30 as the main engine.
Nice lil airbrake example as well
Oh yeah, Su-35S gonna be without airbrake in WT. Unless they will suddenly implement it as a game mechanic (which i highly doubt)
The rafale has a similar system and they modelled it, I can’t see why they wouldn’t on the 35
3 Likes
Then why they didn’t modell it on Su-34?
As far as I can see there is only one report for the Su34 airbrake, and it was made a staggering 6 hours ago with no sources attached.
However if I look at the rafale report for it, I can find two, one labelled as not a bug and one fixed, both with multiple sources attached.
To me this means that once the Su35 hits the dev server it will have to be properly reported as well, I’m sure someone will dig up the files (not Epstein’s) to make one.
Maybe @kizvy got something in store for it.
2 Likes