CAPTOR E has 1400+ they dont give an exact number.
TRMs are only part of the equation, it’s the data processing power
Irl scan speed is variable as it depends on dwell time. Longer dwell time means longer range and vice versa.
Aren’t these thing 1600+T/M?. And why do you thing the Su-35s/IRBIS has bad data processing power?. Are you forgetting the Fact that the Su-35s tech was the test bed for Su-57?. Sure they got old quite fast and was late change on Su-57. But they aren’t bad.
2 Likes
that does not mean it is good.
slopradar for slopplane testbed.
1 Like
i only have that spreadsheet with the russian radars
could you sent the name of the book, or a pdf if available?
3 Likes
At least its real and no Fake for the next 2 to 5 years.
honestly, at this point, weight isnt even a concern anymore, just look at the Mitsubishi F-2, su-35s got a bit more wing area and way bigger control surfaces, and like you said, its got way less drag, Its oswald factor is improved, 0.8+, that alone is a pretty solid gain over the extra weight, so its definitely gonna fly well, thats not even a question anymore, it’s a fact
the only thing Im still wondering about is the Su-35s RWR, is it 360°? can anyone tell me? pleasss
Should still be only ±30 degrees but it gets spherical maws and lwr
1 Like
I didnt say bad I say inferior. I dont think it is a strech to say Russian electronics/avionics and Radar systems are behind on what the West can produce.
I have no issues with IRBIS being good, I take exception when Gaijin just nerf Western kit.
because a certain country is 20 years behind on computer chip manufacturing
1 Like
eceryone is behind taiwan 8n that regard
not to the same degree at all
1 Like
ok, not good but not bad too
Nice propaganda kiddo. The processor of Su-35s are like a few nm bigger than F-35 powerpc processor.
2 Likes
Based on what? We have had access to Russian hardware and have seen no evidence.
2 Likes
one moment, I will grab it
Yea I can’t wait for it tbh but the 30 should still be a little more stable pulling the funny tvc moves but I was thinking with a little less weight in the nose of the 35 it should whip around as well
1 Like
Of course based on public information.
Soviet vs US radar processors comparison | Page 2 | Secret Projects Forum
On the left its Baguette-53-31М1 used on early T-50, So su-35s use a version of it or the same… The right its suppose to be what Su-57 its using now IMA-BK … I don’t know if megapolis will change it. with the sanction.
If I’m not wrong the first use 1890VM8Ya chip in 65nm. The second its suppose to use 1888TX018 with 2 or 4(?) Powerpc 476FP, 45nm. Older version of the 53-31m might be in 0.18 μm/180nm. These are not the radar computer. Solo35.01 and Solo 35.02 are the computer for the radar on Su-35s and info about them are unknow.
At some point F-35 was flying with 90nm chips PowerPC g4. Block4 and tr3 are suppose to use the new L3harris processors. Its unknow in what nm are they build. Speculative they’re 10nm or less.
7 Likes
You have shown a box, we really need to see what’s inside it.
When we compare even missile guidance systems for ISKANDER M the guidance chips were very dated.
Compared to HIMARS or Storm Shadow and that has been a trait of Russian electronic systems while they are perfectly capable they lack behind the West.
I wonder if IRBIS was offered to India for the Su-30MKII if they would select it over the indigenous/Israeli design they are looking to fit
1 Like