Here’s product page for n011m btw
Must be misremembering something, or misinterpreted something, cuz I seem to remember you saying/alluding to Bars being nerfed by not having 90° gimbal limits or something.
Not sure why you bring up the Bars in the EF thread though if its ingame scan limits are the exact ones on that page, its modelled accurately with no issue?
What I’m saying its largest scan is limited to its electronic scan, like its largest search pattern has to be within electronic limits and rn isn’t modeled to go beyond them.
So eft scan might be limited to ±70 scan for its largest search zone, like how su30sm largest scan is ±40 as that’s within its electronic scan zone.
Essentially I think that the eurofighter scan angle is likely not to be ±100
Oooh makes more sense now.
ECRS uses a different kind of repositioner, its not actualy clear what kind of electronic beam limits it has (educated guess is the bog standard ±60° full power, with an extra ~10° reduced power, and 30° angled plate) so it might be different. Guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
P.S: this is why I didnt wanna swap threads.
1 Like
Yeah fair, I’ll just edit my post clarifying my position
So it has nothing to do with IRL. Cool
1 Like
Great response, as expected from a great commentator on the Forum.
is he wrong tbf
They’ll probably never really change, unless it hits them in the wallet.
I didnt understand “tbf”
to be fair
Ah, I dont know, I just used DCS as a kind of base, even though its a mod. I’m sure that if the community could do something like this in War Thunder, they would do it even better than Gaijin, to be honest, at least in some parts
He’s not wrong, but he also not right. Unless ofc he has access to Su-30SM flight data.
2 Likes
“major nerf”
1 Like