Sukhoi Su-27/30/33/35/37 Flanker series & Su-34 Fullback - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 2)

Different elevation is different in specific plane sources. IIRC Ralin has posted sources about Su-25SM3 has much better elevation coverage than other ones.

Really? It’s the same ±30 as all other l150s in game

That’s quite interesting, considering just as kizvy said - every single L-150 version in-game has the same angle coverage

Maybe it was not enough for report or still in consideration

Su34 is not mentioned, so ig it really doesn’t have a built in rwr

image
my brother in christ

4 Likes

W I’m blind, gonna blame not having my glasses with me rn

NGL it would be hella metal if that Su-34 evaded patriot without even an RWR.

2 Likes

IIRC НУ is not RWR itself but block responsible for sending guidance to ARM

1 Like

Looking at the table - it could mean that all those platforms have L-150-30M.1 and diffrent guidance blocks.
image

1 Like

image
another thing - looking at KRET site - Khibiny could work as an RWR? Identification and indication of the most dangerous radar.

how do we know that the flanker can carry only 2 r27t/et
i found this

Transportation.

1 Like

They can’t be fired/track a target, it’s using wrong pylons

1 Like

Launchers under and between intakes are AKU, they don’t contain coolant bottle, but has spring for safe detach and push

2 Likes

i need to learn the different pylons so i don’t get misinformed

another based fullback moment
image

3 Likes

You might think so, but it’s not true. The Su-34 uses either ARM or Khibiny to gather information. The NU is what aggregates this information. Your assumption is dashed by the lack of antennas on the Su-34 itself.

image

2 Likes

Like semi RWR. As the Su-34 pilot said: “Khibiny may show some radiation, but we are warned about the launch by the ground station or escort.”

chat my r-77 lacking maneuverability bug report got accepted. now its time for them to sit on it and never implement it like the aam4 bug reports lol

6 Likes