Not only Su-35. MiG-29/SMT/M, Su-24, Su-30, Su-34.
India and Africa as british subtrees, Taiwan and mainland China together already in game.
Yeah probably can fit some F15’s and Eurofighters, maybe when time comes french F22 and Algerian Su57 as well, no?
1 Like
India and South Africa are both Commonwealth members though.
And Taiwan and China are both “Chinas”.
France will already have 5th gen planes thanks to Belgium (F-35), hence it makes even less sense to add the su-57 from a nation that has no ties with them to their tree yes.
No.
It’s ChineseCheezePizza in game, not Taiwan.
My response was clearly ironic, France already has a subtree with which it will be able to have the F35, as you said.
I just answered the other’s guy comment because it sounded stupid, the nation with the best top tier jet (and benelux) has no need for the jets he mentioned.
2 Likes
Oh alright.
Yes, BeNeLux is already a huge element itself. That’s why I don’t understand people who are asking for yet another nation to be put in France…
Again; “You’re the one that have to provide evidence of that…”
Also no name for the Guy that worked on FlankerS?
how can I post evidence of a thing not existing? I think you being unable to post images of these aircraft carrying such pylon means that it does not exist on these aircraft
3 Likes
Oh you don’t get it. You have to prove that THAT don’t exist. You have to prove that the INFO that gaijin has its Wrong. Not me. You.
Until you prove that all you said its nonsense and cope. Just like THAT Kh-38 Thread.
Lol, than I can say god exists and you can’t prove he doesn’t exist, epic logic…
What nonsense are you talking?? the Pylon do exist… Just same cope people use on Kh-38.
Than you can show me a photo of it?
1 Like
Excuse me wh-
More seriously, France is fine and doesn’t Algerian vehicles. Algeria would be a much better sub for USSR than for France, and we can agree that Benelux is very much enough to add some variety and gap filling
2 Likes
It exists bro trust.
2 Likes
Its up to you to show proof. And don’t come with stupid theological take. The info of it exist somewhere; Maybe the Manufacture of the pylon. The Russian ministry of defense or even a patent… etc… If you can’t get the info to prove gaijin wrong. Its your problem not mine.
I’m here just pointing your nonsense.
my proof is that currently no images exist of any aircraft outside of the Su-35 using the pylon, please provide counter proof :)
4 Likes
You talk nonsense here, you say it exist, than show us a photo or something.
4 Likes
That’s not how that works at all. Proving a negative (e.g. not possible, doesn’t exist) is not possible. Therefore failure to prove the positive is seen as the proof of the negative.
So, if you say that the SU-30SM can’t use the dual pylon, you’d try to prove that it can use them. If you fail at that, you have proven that it can’t
9 Likes
that wasnt some mod
it was Smin the community manager with a response from the devs