As would the radar (which he was using). All the IRST does is give the seeker an azimuth & elevation angle to point at before launch. The radar can provide that same information.
Not really sure what you are trying to argue here? Multiple primary sources state those are the lock ranges. And the the missile will run out of energy way before it reaches a 70 km rear aspect target anyway, so it’s kind of academic.
So in game this system is modelled with LOAL?
Does it have a DL? Whats to stop the target moving out of the seeker gimble over these kind of distances?
Personally i prefer ER over regular R-77, sometimes over 77-1 as well.
Having such a big missile with insane speed,range and quite good agility alongside with hard lock gives you insane BVR capabilities, especially at 12.7-13.7.
The Iranian F-14 has an RWR from the 50s
It is terrible it also lacks a single all aspect missile with an Aim9P…yes a 9.7 air to air missile as it’s IR option.
But it has Fakours and they were good once so now it faces Su-27/33/30 and F/A 18s and is absolute food
They are constantly getting kills thanks to those fakours and incompetent players, not to mention for some reason fakours only gives you warning around 8-10km instead of 16 which gives you much less time to notch if you’re at high altitude.
Not to mention it shouldn’t be able to use R27R in the first place.
Anyway I personally hate Iranian Tomcat users so I especially hunt them if they are on the other side.
so far the general opinion on the N-035 is…
that its actual garbage at maintaining both tws and tts.
any of you found a workaround yet? and is someone working on a report?
Also problem isn’t the notching its the reaction time when fakours appears on your RWR screen, due to some interesting choices from Gaijin they don’t give you radar warning until they are in 8-10km range which is a very narrow window if you’re at high altitude with heavy fighter (like Su-27-30).