true the mig-23 also had alot of thrust, but at the cost of a very short engine life
1 Like
J75 engines pushes power similar to F100’s, etc etc
It is as an EAWACS, Tanker killer many sources are reporting this
Genuine question, did the hud pic i posted earlier or language in the post warrant a flagging? I’m new to the forums
might have been the HUD itself because it is technically footage from “an ongoing conflict” which isnt that well regarded over here, you might have to ask a forum moderator directly to ask if it is ok to post
here is a the list with the forum moderators, just DM one of them to ask
https://forum.warthunder.com/g/Forum%20Moderators?order=last_seen_at
thx m8
are you talking about the KS-172 or R-37M?
KS-172 missile
yeah, that one’s just an awacs killer
But given the fact that the tech it would have also improved. I’ve seen a load of papers on these material side of things, coming close to non classified western stuff. Obviously application is a different thing but at least we know they are better than what they were a few years back.
F100-PW-220 level?
what’s the MTBO of the PW-220?
the EP is real ?
Just material. Not actual engines.
But PW220 is definitely not where they’re at.
very real and very much in service
Yeah, just Passive radar homing
PW100 then?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
it says 4000 cycles for hot sections and 8000 for cold on the PW-220