Some say we already fly T-10 in game based on the airframe performance. But i doubt that this cockpit would be a final form, since even MiG-29 has a radar TV screen. Although it could be like with MiG-23 and only projected on the HUD.
1 Like
“Not a bug”
@Gunjob Can you ask for an explanation please?
I even gave you Zaslon as an example.
Which is a much older PESA from the same manufacturer, and it was known to have been limited by the processing power of its computer, due to unavailability of faster computers in the Soviet Union at the time, and even that one’s largest scan pattern is three times as large as what Su-30SM’s Bars radar gets in the game.
1 Like
1 Like
i also pinged a guy on discord, that might be able to help
I will go little bit about Su-34NVO:
M433 Raduga-VM is thermal cam but question is if it can operator use it to find and lock targets or it is only to gain data and send it to ground by datalink.
@k_stepanovich @Gunjob @Smin1080p_WT
This answer makes absolutely no sense.
1- The zone for tracking “already known targets” would be at a minimum the limits of the electronic beam steering.
Which is ±45 by ±40 deg (or ±45 by ±45 deg from more recent sources), which would be:
45 * 2 * 40 * 2 = 7200 square degrees, and not 5500 square degrees.
2- The source literally says “зона сканирования при одновременном
сопровождении целей, кв. Град. 5.500”
“scanning zone with simultaneous target tracking”
It’s obviously not just “Tracking zone” otherwise they wouldn’t use the phrase “зона сканирования” (“Scanning zone”).
3- Right underneath it, it specifies the ACM scan patterns. It’s obvious that this would be the (largest) TWS/BVR scan pattern.
I.e.
BVR scan pattern = …
ACM scan pattern = …
Spoiler
4- I already gave you the example of Zaslon which is a much older PESA from the same manufacturer and was limited by the processing power of its computer. Even that one gets 90x20 = 1800 square degrees scan pattern.
So how is the much more modern Bars limited to 600 square degrees?
Did it evolve but backwards?
2 Likes
U can’t talk logic to some of those people, they don’t understand it and can’t be bothered to think. Make contact with some of the more senior staff and/or reliable ones who knows about this better. Maybe DM them and make new bug report.
Its not the first time they’ve done odd things like this either.
Thr PS-05/A Raven from the Gripen is a direct successor to the Blue Vixen radar, and in-game is basicly just a copy paste with some HMD modes, while the CAPTOR-M, also a successor to the BV and to some degree a successor of the PS-05/A, yet in-game, both the BV and PS-05/A have max scan area’s of 684°² while the CAPTOR-M has a paltry 504°²…
Im not sure whats been going on with the radar devs the last few updates, but they’ve been screwing things up pretty bad.
1 Like
Screwing MiG-23 radar is also good example.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/vQbSF865Q4V8
1 Like
How is the captor-m “in some ways” a successor to the gripen radar?
Both are derived from the Blue Vixen
iirc, it uses some parts from it along with implementing things learned during the development of the PS-05/A. Could be misremembering tho.
I have the Feeling the irst on the flanker is just way to fast so extremely hard to find and lock things compared to the MiG-23
If it’s much faster it would probably be completely useless in its current state
Su-30SM does have some nice looking radar MFDs …
Option to show the historical MFD Radar & RWR interface instead of the generic ones:
Hey guys, the Su-27 wing root is supposed to be flush, right? Or is this gap supposed to be here? I remember someone reported this was a bug for the Su-30SM, but is is meant to be here on the other Flankers?
2 Likes
it is supposed to be like that on the su27
1 Like
Alright.
Su-33
Huh. I wonder why they made it flush on some variants but not others-