Right now? yeah i does nothing. If gaijin do modele it correct in the future it would mean less range. But the points still stand. No Nations with Typhoon in game has AESA radar installed on them. In the Future when Germany finally start producing that AESA it could be installed on the Quadriga Eurofighters.
In what way is the Eurofighter unable to “cruise” above mach at mil power? It’s more than able to do such, and has shown to do it as well.
Can’t quite site a 2J here.
What is?
FGFA has no relation to the Su-57, nor does it exist. Get back on topic.
And I clearly stated Aero India 24, at which India was directly invited to contract Su-57 deliveries.
If he does mean prior to such, he’s failed to clarify.
What update?
Probably MLUs that just gives better lifetime/hours to the airframe. Unless Russia finally figured out a cheap way to make AESA which would honestly be a possibility since they started equipping pantsirs with AESAs now
No one was clowned, Eurofighter mains can’t accept that their version of supercruise shares no parity with the F-22. Instead they continue to push that the Eurofighter has similar or better kinematics to Sukhois which is laughable.
Repeating what you said after I debunked the nonsense is poor argument practice
…
1 Like
actually, funds were allocated for it in 2024. it is NOT cancelled
FGFA was a 2 seater derivative of su-57 for IAF use, however it never left the blueprints iirc
You haven’t “debunked” a single thing I’ve said, try again.
Where have you seen that?
That’s PMF, not FGFA. It is quite literally a T-50.
At the very least you should hold basic understanding of the imagery you post.
The only info about it.
Spoiler
IMO the best options should be that they change Everything. AL-41 for 177c. Update IRBIS with some cheap GaAs something like what Indian did with BARS and the new Virupaksha AESA Radar. Its not like they don’t have GaN tech. The Phazotron FGA-35 was GaN based And that thing its already like 10yo and was powerful for a small jet like mig35. Change the old and bulky Baguette computer for the new IMA BK on su-57. So it now can use Fiber optic instead of FBW…etc.
Man even half of these change would be really good. Also all of them reduce the weight of the jet.
2 Likes
“Anybody that disagrees with me or says anything I don’t agree with is a troll!!1!”
Classic MiG-23M sentiment.
Either extrapolate or substantiate.
When interactions like:
Gets met with:
The only thing people can take you as is a hypocritical idiot.
1 Like
Oh, Checkmate (aka Su-75) mentioned
177c?
But 177S is AL-41, well more rather the one on the Su-57/S-70 drone not the cheaper versions on the Su-35/30SM2
Nvm I was thinking of the 117S. Apparently 177S incorporates AL-51 stuff to the AL-41. That engine ain’t getting mlunted anytime soon though since it’s new development
Yea they talked about finally building two units for test.
Not really and AL-41F-1S/117s engine but an AL-31 with new Manufacturing methods and stuff from AL-51. It a 14500 tons engine. With 6000h lifespan and Less fuel consumption. While Al-41F-1s its 14000tons with 4000h and few mm large in diameter…
33:56 on the video its from AEROINDIA this year.
There’s no way in hell this is an AL-31F. Even the AL-31FN-5 showed directly next to both the supposed 177S and 41F-1S in India differed GREATLY visually, let alone what differences may arise in distinct modules themselves.
At the very most the '177S could be an upgrade on the '117S, though that brings into question what needed to happen to attach a Kuznetsov style IFM to a Lyulka core…
No engine is able to produce over 14k “tons” of thrust.
Vodka - alien tech lmao. But jokes aside. He meant probably 14 tonnes - force (~140 kN).
1 Like