They could at least give us early access like french coastal
7 Likes
I would be completely fine with that.
From the latest datamine.
This is either Infantry or Submarines.
It’s kind of funny that we haven’t had a Closed Beta Test since France Coastal, back when I joined Gaijin was adding lots of tech trees so there was at least one each year… But now we know there will be another!
6 Likes
Swedish navy CBT
5 Likes
Fingers crossed for submarines…
If I want to play with infantry. I’ll just boot up Enlisted. No point in having infantry in WT
5 Likes
[offtopic]
If players think CAS is toxic in tank battles, you dont want an infantry guy with RPG in city map.
[/offtopic]
Well so what are the CBT options? Submarines or Naval TT for new nation. Or something completely new. But my bet is on naval tt for new nation…
2 Likes
My bet is on Infantry.
Maps are not designed to support infantry (cant enter buildings, objects and textures are not detailed enough for first person camera)
1 Like
So that’s why CBT exist, isn’t it?
It’s not even one days after BVVD saids Submarine will not be in near and this guys have too many copium
2 Likes
Isn’t it.
We dont have too much copium. We are saying its either submarines or new nation naval TT. Infantry will never come to WT, as Gaijin would create competition for its own produuct - Enlisted.
1 Like
From what the leaks suggest infantry has its own mode with its own maps so they wouldnt just be plopped in regular ground battles
i pray to the snail the CBT is for subs though
1 Like
PLEASE CAN WE HAVE SUBMARINES, they were so fun to play in the playtesting. We need them or naval gonna be dead… also ADD NUCLEAR SUBMARINES!! they also would be so cool to have, we should add USS Ohio and Kilo class / yasen / akula class subs
6 Likes
Don’t worry give Gaijin 90 more years and we getting the space tree.
Now that we have direct, explicit confirmation that submarines are being worked on ( yay ), here 's a side project I’ve had: documenting all the ships currently in the game, and CDK, which have depth charges modelled on them which are unused.
This list does not include ships which also have loadouts for depth charges which are unused, whether or not that overlaps w/ them having the weapons modelled. For a list of those unused loadouts, use @gszabi99 's Naval loadouts list.
Depth charge rails on USS Cleveland. It 's currently the highest BR vessel to have some.
Ships which have unused depth charge rails:
FRA: Aigle, Milan, La Combattante(destroyer), Chacal, Leopard, Panthere, Le Triomphant, Vauquelin, Aconit, Marne, Aisne, Le Brestois
DE: Z12, Z15, Z43, Z46, Z47, Z4 Zestorer, Karl Marx, Drache
ITA: Albatros F543, Alcione F544, Attilio Regolo, Comandante Margottini, Geniere D555, Impetuoso, Leone, Grecale, Da Verazzano, Aviere, Corazziere, Geniere, MAS 441, MC-485
JPN: Agano, Furutaka, Kako, Sendai, Yubari, Akizuki, Ayanami, Hatsuharu, Hatsuzuki, Hayanami, JDS Isuzu, Kiyoshimo, Matsu, JDS Murasame, Nenohi, Yugumo, JDS Yugure, Yukikaze, Tsugaru
GB: HMS Enterprise, HMS Hawkins, HMS Churchill, HMS Montgomery, HMS Grafton, HMCS Haida, HMS Calpe, HMS Brissenden, HMS Jervis, HMS Kelvin, HMS Nepal, HMS Eskimo, HMS Mohawk, HMS Vega, HMS Verdun, HMS Abdiel, HMS Saumarez
USA: USS Atlanta, USS Cleveland, USS Barker, USS Litchfield, USS Welborn C. Wood, USS Aylwin, USS Fletcher, USS Bennion, USS Cowell, USS Gearing, USS Frank Knox, USS Mitscher, USS Wilkinson, USS Porter, USS Moffett, USS Phelps, USS Somers, USS Davis, USS Sumner, USS Coolbaugh
USSR: Besposhchadny, Ryany, Soobrazitelny, Stroyny, Moskva, Tashkent, Ognevoy, Letuchiy, Pr.201K, Pr.201M, Yenot, Rosomacha, MPK-33
The Squid mortar, seen here on HMS Armada. I started this project when I found this, and then kept finding unused things similar to it.
Ships which have unused depth charge mortars:
FRA: Leopard
ITA: Impetuoso
JPN: JDS Ayanami
GB: HMS Armada, HMS Tobruk, HMS Daring, HMS Diamond, HMS Diana, HMS Leopard
USA: USS Davis, USS Coolbaugh, USS Dealey
USSR: Admiral Kuznetsov, Baku
Depth charge storage in Syonan. One of the largest by number of DP present.
Ships which have unused ammo storages for depth charge rails:
FRA: La Combattante(destroyer), Panthere, Chacal, Leopard, Vauquelin
ITA: Impetuoso
JPN: Syonan, Type 4 (Mod. 2), Type 4 (Mod. 4), Ha-go (Mod. 1), Shisaka
GB: HMS Hawkins, HMS Garland, HMS Grafton, HMS Calpe, HMS Brissenden
USSR: BMO, MO-4
Reloads for mortars on Vautour. Only the charges loaded on the mortars are available ingame at the time of writing.
Ships which have unused ammo storages for depth charge mortars:
FRA: Vautour, Leopard, Panthere
JPN: JDS Ayanami, Ikazuchi, Type K-8 No.13(early), Type K-8 No.13(late)
GB: HMS Churchill, HMS Montgomery
USA: USS Cowell
USSR: Spokoniyy, Blagorodnyy, Pr.122bis, Admiral Kuznetsov, Baku
Additional depth charges on USS Fletcher, visible, yet unusable.
Ships which have reloads for depth charge rails on their visual model, but not in the X-ray:
FRA: Aconit
JPN: JDS Yugure
GB: HMCS Brantford, HMS Liscomb
USA: USS Fletcher, USS Bennion, USS Cowell, USS Sumner
USSR: SKR Groza, Spokoinyy
Unusable reloads for the mortars of Aconit.
Ships which have reloads for depth charge mortars on their visual model, but not in the X-ray:
FRA: Aconit
JPN: JDS Yugure
GB: HMCS Brantford
USA: USS Bennion, USS Phelps, USS Davis
15 Likes
I think infantry is supposed to be event ?
CBT would also align with the “all naval nations get something new”
And if someone mentions BvvD’s video, you have to remember it was shot before the current update, most likely around October/September
4 Likes
It was “each nation with naval getting something.” (which obviously and undoubtfully means we are getting submarines 100% confirmed day one on Nintendo Switch 2)
4 Likes
edited it
1 Like
Knowing gaijin it will be another kind of cbt…
But hopium guys!
1 Like
1 Like
OT: but why would they add Infantry…
Just play enlisted.
3 Likes