This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
I love Big Suka Sukhoi.
2 Likes
mods sniped it lmao welp
1 Like
I will remember your sacrifice o7
1 Like
Hmm, no.
2 Likes
Is it Ausairpower analysis from Dr Carlo Kopp?!
If yes you found the best su 57 rcs analysis
Exactly man. I ve said it too many times. They call prototype without any update, su57
Production version has hide screws. T50 510 had screws exposed
1 Like
ARES(Advanced Raptor Enhancement & Sustainment) F22 ?!
There are some issues with it
It uses pofacets which can’t model creeping waves, it uses fully absorbing ram for intakes while forgetting radar blockers, and forgets some sensor bumps.
Stealthflankers simulation is more accurate imo, su57 geometric rcs when irst is closed is similar to that of a f35
2 Likes
Agree
Also this analysis shows production version of the su57(with RAM material/skin and intake air radar waves krates) has a RCS classified as VLO(Very Low Observable), its is lower than -30 to -35 DBSM/ 0.001 to 0.0005 square meters, less furtive than f22, but not like propaganda on social media . But very similar to f35a, which is -30 to -35 DBSM
This is about the minimum RCS . The average rcs number is different
iirc, the claim was a mig 31 had shot it down with the r37, not the su 57.
1 Like
because it is highly classified, even the Su-34 prototype had one, which they are bringing back on the Su-34M. There are many things that are not confirmed but known on the Su-57.
My suggestion for this beauty is finally done.
I have another one coming, some whom may be able to guess what it is since I did the Felon.
3 Likes
Su-75?
Not the Su-75
Su-57M1
1 Like
No, but should that be another suggestion or implemented into the current one?
Different suggestion for sure, I mean you wouldn’t suggest an F-15A and F-15C as the same plane right?