They put a driver “untrained on teh tank” in their flagship future MBT for a public parade?
Why would they do that? Why not, say, one of hte drivers who had been part of hte testing for hte last 5 or 6 or 7 years or however long it has been??
1 Like
So called “stealthy” f22 here
4 Likes
I would expect them like something like pantsir rn
1 Like
plane that wasnt cleaned/repainted
something you should understand
F22:
1 Like
It is about the screws you can see
1 Like
Nothing a spring clean cant fix
So how is it a problem on the su57 but not on the f22
1 Like
I was replying to noister about the F-22 he sent not being cleaned/repainted
Yes, this is an old RAM coating, especially common in the navy. The LO coating itself is not very resistant to moisture and sea salts. But this is already in the past, now they use a new LO coating similar to a mirror. It is resistant to moisture and salts.
In the press it is called a mirror coating.
When the F-22 comes to War Thunder, this is the paint scheme I want the most.
How handsome he is!
3 Likes
How handsome he is!
You failed to explain how the screws are a problem on the su57 but not on the f22
1 Like
Literally can say the same for the t50 video you sent, crazy double standards
4 Likes
Reading is a skill Mr. Noister
1 Like
my point here is something you should understand, that t50 wasnt cleaned or repainted either like f22
1 Like
you point wasn’t very articulated
Do you know where this photo is from or what plane it was taken from and what preceded it?
did you when you said “And this is compared to the F-22 :D”
1 Like
Cracks and peeling in the area between the canopy and the nose.
This is the result of RAM coating aging and thermal expansion/contraction. But this is an old photo and is not relevant. Since now there is a completely new RAM coating.
This is all assuming the information coming out of Russia is accurate. As current events have clearly showed, the Russian’s have not only been lying to the world about their vehicles capabilities but also lying to themselves internally as well.
Gaijin it seems does very little to verify what is actually accurate when it comes to Russian equipment.
Take the Kh38-MT for example, there has been quite abit of talk on the forums here if the missile existed beyond a wooden mock up and a vague brochure ad.
2 Likes