Su-39: R77,R27,R73

It already suffers greatly in ARB same with 25t and the one thats even higher BR. Giving it r77 would only help it, but it would have to go to 12.7 at least anything lower and its clubbing, maybe if it was in the US tech tree it could be 12.3 (a-10c at 11.3 when the sm3 was 12.3 LMAO). It would still be more viable at 12.7 with r77 than it is now.

The bigger issue is it would no longer be 11.3 or 11.7 in GRB, which make it effetively a dead plane as you immedietly have better options for CAS for lineups at 12.0+, it barely competes at 11.7 already vs the su24 for grb lineups. If gaijin was really generous and put it at 12.0 in GRB it would have a place as CAP I guess.

I suspect thats why it hasnt gotten these missiles. No one buys this for ARB, it is meant to be a CAS plane for paypiggies that bought the t80 at 11.7. Giving it r77 will ruin that and cause a lot of players who bought it frustration. Those players are not going to be happy having to uptier to 12.0 at minimum when they dont have 12.0 lineups.

1 Like

Missile loadouts are always a balancing decision. Which is why for example the Jaguar Gr1A doesn’t have 9Ls and the Tornado Gr1 doesn’t have Aim-9Ms.

The only upgrade the Su39 could get without just increasing it’s BR to above 12.0 would be 2x R-27R/Ts.

If it can have 4x R73s then that would fine too, but would still go up to 11.7.

1 Like

More r73 isnt going to help, r73 strength is in dogfights with HMD, su39 doesnt get HMD, and you would also rely on players being dumb and trying to dogfight a subsonic when they can just bully it with impunity BnZ style.

Yeah, but apparently the A10C is crazy OP at 11.7 despite it being identical, so god knows

Range is a big factor on the 9ms.

Will be when they fix the lock ranges, pretty hard limited to about 3km at the moment

IDK i only have them on the 2 german planes but ive launched them from 6-9km and gotten kills with them top down. R73 uses fov gating so you dont really want to launch them farther than you would an r60 in most cases since they will get 1 flared otherwise, except side aspect.

Its a lot easier to sneak in a 9m without someone noticing, and in these short furball matches that matters a lot, 1v1 sure it wont work but ARB right now is taking advantage of the chaos to kill people who dont expect it.

I’ve been unable to launch, despite being within the LSZ according to my radar

I feel like adding a separate Su-39 in the tree would probably be the best way to go with this. (Your all welcome for my very original opinion :])

It is the “solution” taken for the Viggen D and Tornado F3 and so long as it was foldered somehow, would be the most sensible solution at this time. Its a shame dynamic BRs are unlikely to be a thing

2 Likes

Or a proper Su-25T. IIRC there is a suggestion on RU forum for it, quite detailed one (it even got proposed loadout pictures)

1 Like

:O hopefully that gets passed to devs. I’ve always loved the frogfoots

Slight correction - it was Su-25TM and it was passed to the developers

1 Like

The SU-25TM never had the same optimised FCS the SU-39 had to fire the RVV-AE and R-27R1 (the SUO-39P I believe), they’ll maybe give it said weapons on a theorised basis.

I go to extensive detail about this somewhere in this discussion with sources

Funny enough the SU-39 and possibly the SU-25T should also recieve a HMS iirc, there is a plethora of things these vehicles are missing.

this aged well

3 Likes

If the su39 got hmd and all the toys it is supposed to have at 12.7 it would be incredibly fun. I sometimes fly it with radar vikirs and kh29 just for fun to try and get kill with them in ARB and ASB, sim is the main reason I bought it radar seemed like it would be fun there, though i mostly play dcs anymore for that.

IMO su-39 with 4 r-77s, 2 -73s and lots of vikhrs would be an amazing ground strike aircraft at 13.0 for air. IMO, 12.7 is too low for 4 r-77s.

Idk the ice at 13.0 with 4 aim 120 and 9ms kinda blows it out of the water, isnt there like a harrier at 12.7 with aim120?

The ICE and F3 are largely forced down due to compression but probably should be 13.3. F3 would be easy to fix and get back up, Fix BOL and add at least 1x Phimat pod and it would be a strong 13.3. With room to go up higher with Aim-120C5s and maybe even ASRAAM. F4F ICE is tricky, as I dont think it has the same kind of buff options, but just decompressing and moving all 14.0s to 14.3 and some 13.7s to 14.0 would do the trick

It would be best to compare the Su-39 with aircraft like the FA2, AV-8B+, Kfir C10 and J-8F