Only the first one is a valid source, none of the rest are
Just bug report it if you think so, surely you’ll have the sources to properly back up your claim
Theres no source for that.
1 Like
All sources bad. Cuz no Su-30 except Su-30SM2 with new engines.
(That’s the point)
Even wikipedia disagrees with you, which is honestly hilarious
Even first one isnt, since it only lists models, not stating that specificly 41FP has 14500.
None of these state that the Su-30SM can use the AL-31FM-1.
14500 isnt mounted thrust since theres channel losses regardless
only Su-30SM2 has/will have AL-41F1S.
And its too much of a difference to change, unlike Su-27SM3.
So, you have started doing random stuff?
What
MK2 got the 31F-M1 in limited supply in the mid '00s
Gotta love all this forum coal…
Uh… IDK about it. Never heard.
1 Like
Crazy title change…
Rosoboronexport states AL-31F.
1 Like
Next time would be - Su-30SM needs better “insert”
The Su-30SM not only has no proof of using such engines, but ultimately this is a balancing measure.
One of the best radars at 14.0, 14 rather solid missiles. This is the Su-30SMs benefits, at the massive downside of its flight performance.
We call these “trade offs” and ultimately you need to just deal with them-
J-11B/Typhoon - Weaker end of radars for their BR, lowest Fox 3 quantity, but their flight performance is great
F-15E - Fast as all hell, can’t turn to save its life
Rafale - Amazing WVR performance at the cost of a rather pitiful BVR performance
F/A-18 - 10 AIM-120s, and an excellent dogfight performance, but too slow to BVR and lacking proper Dogfight missiles.
All the 14.0s have trade-offs.
6 Likes
no rly xD