so why did russia have it in service sooner smh
3 Likes
and what is the balance?
I found something on the internet that was it, that’s all
?
Your post’s were removed due to inappropriate parts, being slightly political for some. The ones that were hidden were given more so as a chance for you to edit those parts out so it can actually be up, but you just said X person reported your post, when it reality it was Y person.
If it weren’t for those parts, they would be fine, unless I am missing something of course
10 Likes
yeah and only though well agree in tank battles we still can’t kill the same leaky leo 2a6
What was political???
On a Russian forum they would answer like that right away
everything is muhahahaphphphph
Well if the NATO side wasn’t so stacked, maybe people would play redfor so you can find a match
Well, NATO doesn’t have one (except Sweden)
Lmao because I got mass reported, as per usual (due to facts)
“If anything, nerf CAS entirely. Cough cough your Russiaphobia is showing again”
Once again, slightly political, depending on views of course, but I’d say it’s best to avoid such words, whether that be a western or eastern country.
4 Likes
Eeeeeh not really
The Su-30SM derives from the Russian-Indian Joint Su-30MKI,which is an improved version of the Su-30 which in turns is the Su-27PU (basically a A2A only Su-27 with the dual cockpit of the Su-27UB)
The Su-27SM is the mid-life upgrade of base Su-27s and the improved Su-27S variant.
Different airframes, slightly different engines, slightly different avionics and slightly different stats.
You need to understand that the Su-33,Su-34,Su-30,Su-27SM and the Su-35 are all slightly different projects that may have something in common, excluding the fact that they all come from the base Su-27
The Su-33 is derived from the Su-27K,the Su-34 from both the Su-33 and the Su-27KUB,the Su-30 as i said from the Su-27PU,the Su-35 from the Su-27M and finally the Su-27SM from the Su-27S
Same thing with the upcoming J-11B: tracing its origins is a mess
so you it is ok if you only find pictures on THE INTERNET where it carries 6 r-77 but when iam it isnt great…
I love double standarts
1 Like
I love how nothing about the flight performance in the dev blog is true.
Its fat, underpowered, has the worst flight performance among all Flankers in the game, and the thrust vectoring is not even modelled correctly.
I have seen higher quality in kids drawings than i have seen in this plane. What is Gaijin smoking?
6 Likes
Bro would rather give up on an entire game mode (the best mode), rather than learn how to use SPAA. Only top-tier is heavily weighted towards CAS, and that’s not where the most fun is in GRB, anyway.
Not to mention, this is a video game. I’ll play any nation I want, based entirely on ingame factors - not anything outside of that (geopolitics).
1 Like
translation errors ron i don’t understand you
That’s because most redfor play 11.3/11.7 where they always outnumber bluefor due to the lack of redfor premiums above 11.3
Which is what I said.
But the mig29 is still vastly superior to that of any aircraft at 12.7 that can carry bombs in bluefor
Mig 29 and Mig 23 are the fastest aircraft at their respective BRs
Skill issue. R-24R and R-27ER are the best SARH at their respective BRs. As for IRs. Mig23 holds major advantage with having all-aspect Vs rear-aspect only. And whilst the Mig29 is getting a little underpowered at 12.7, it’s speed compensates well.
And?
And?
Fair, but nothing can be done about that unless you are suggesting fake nerfs/buffs
1 Like
Tupolev 30 now
2 Likes