Your win rate is the the F-14 IRIAF, so basically your shooting the the aim54 or the equivalent at long range. Your f-5A is at 50% your mig 23 is 57%. So basically you just are very bad at using the mig 29 and are able to get easy kills with the f-14 as its an easy plane to get kills with due to its weapon system.
Ah balance, like the Finnish F-18’s HMS that doesn’t move for some reason. Or having 60 CMs for some reason.
Sukhoiiiiiiiiiii
It’s been awhile since I’ve been excited for a Russian aircraft, looking forward to the Su-30SM and its new features.
Winrates in SB mean bugger all. That bracket especially is barely played by redfor due to the lack of redfor premiums (and often the redfor players are in their premiums being played in the 10.7 to 11.7 bracket below) and bluefor has a lot of decent CAS and multirole aircraft that can win on tickets alone, like the tornado GR4 or F-4S.
If anything, the mig-29 holds the advantage at that BR over most bluefor aircraft and at 13.0 redfor have the massive advantage of having the F4F-ICE.
So, Mig-29 is bad because I have bad redfor winrates in SB. Is a pretty weak argument.
My F-5A is 2 matches, and it has no SAS, so I’m sim it’s trash if you’re flying on controller.
I also don’t know that airframe.
Ah yes the MiG 23 I haven’t touched in a few years? Back when it was top?
I’m so bad at using the Mig-29SMT, that’s crazy, considering I was Really good with the Mig-29. It’s called the meta shift. Everything was balanaced before aim-9ms, then they came out and wiped out RedFor.
If you’re gonna try to pull an argument, pull a valid one.
Someone’s angy the playing field might be even now.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I guess you dont play Top Tier the BVM was Broken for like 8 months before they fixed it. It was immune to ammo detonation
Win rate means a lot.
On redfor:
your always outnumbered
Your bomb load is lower
Your sometimes slower
Your aams are hit or miss, typically a miss.
No smokeless aams
Larger targets
Worse radar
Worse rwr
Just like how the forum moderators are In favor of the NATO bois.
I brought up honesty, and MY posts gets removed. What a biased system…
It’s funny, I’ve seen a lot more brimstone kills than KH-38 kills. (You can also carry more brimstones, and I’m sure the SP cost is less).
but it’s okay USA is getting 3 jets and a literal top tier premium.* Wheres the balance hmm??
The aim9m’s didnt break the balance, you are just finding something to blame for your lack luster game play, and if you want to blame others for your shortfalls then you do you boo boo.
AIM-9M can be just unexpected sometimes, mostly that occurs when you wont see missile with smoke too
LMAOOOO
Have you ever used a 9M? Even today they’re still the superb aam.
Please tell me, oh wise one, which aams are better?
With 4 battles played 😂😂😂😂😂 thats a cope
In Sim there’s also no big red diamond
Sorry I was able to spade it in 4 battles, meanwhile the Mig-29SMT took 18.
Thats exactly the opposite of how these forums go lol trust me alot of my post get removed for saying Russian vehicles in this game are bias and dont compare to irl counterpart
Well… i know?
It still doesnt change statement above
There are many things incorrect like reload speed, but that’s off topic, and typically all of that is in favor of NATO, not Russia
I’m not saying you specifically, but others don’t think sim changes much or something.
I haven’t fallen for any propaganda, I just believe that NATO isn’t being handicapped, and that they are infact extremely good in air.
Even in ground the 2 best nations are Sweden and Germany.