Never said or implied that. Seems you only reply to be provocative so I don’t plan on engaging with you. Have a good one.
EFT does that no? Got buffed in the MAWS department too
yes, you are typically the person who is very scientific about everything on paper and what is written down. In reality, you have no idea about the world
1 Like
You mean jets with inferior radars and weapons…
It’s to showcase that its flight performance is good enough for the weapons it has for 14.0.
The only way Su-30SM goes down in BR is if many, many other jets also go down in BR, including the F-15E which has an inferior kit while having a similar energy retention as the Su-30SM.
F-15E is 1022kg/min fuel consumption vs 866kg/min of Su-30SM.
@CAMPER_REMOVER
So according to your post, everyone that has real world experience are wrong and only you are correct.
Keep claiming to be the only person that plays top BR, one day you’ll accept reality.
Keep claiming that real world experience is paper, all you do is prove everyone here correct.
At what time does the funeral start ?
But wouldn’t it be better and reasonable to compare it with other 14.0 jets? Because its performance in 14.0 doesn’t make sense if all comparison it has are on non-14.0 in the first place
Okay, Alwis. I don’t care. I just care that the plane wasn’t very good before, but now it’s a pice of trash. The nerf was unjustified and pointless.
Well, I did just compare it to F-15E which it matched outside acceleration.
Su-30SM has a superior radar, weapons, and weapons load to F-15E as well.
1 Like
Can you compare time to climb? That’s the thing I’m most interested in
Russia never gets anything nice.
I’m getting the document formatted as we speak.
Time to 10,000 meters with 9 minutes of fuel is 115 seconds, which is equal to Su-33, and 26 seconds slower than F-15E.
More vehicles are getting tested on 9 and 5 minutes, so that’s all I have at this time.
Thank you
This has to be ragebait…right?
People need to stop assuming sincere opinions are bait, let alone rageful… what part of that sentence suggests he’s mad?
It was sarcasm, i forgot the /s
It doesn’t have to be meta or op. The su30 hasn’t been outstanding so far before this nerf. That’s why I call the nerf ridiculous and unjustified.
1 Like
If its wrong, then its wrong. If those nerfs are wrong, submit a bug report
It’s completely pointless to write a bug report for this. Because they nerfed it, they want the plane to be useless. And like I said. The su30 dont been anything op before they kill the plane.
1 Like
Given the fact its widely agreed that most soviets vehicles/weapons are left in an over-performing state and heck, it took 3 years for them to nerf the Mig-23 down to IRL performance, I dont really know why you think the devs hate the soviet TT.
Heck, just need to look at KH-38s, the Pantsir, etc to clearly see that they dont. If anything they love the soviets.
But IRL performance is all that matters. If it can be proved wrong, then it should be corrected. Otherwise Battle ratings become pointless and vehicles should be buffed to match performance of similar BR vehicles. I’ll take an F3 Late that can turn fight as well as a Gripen and is as fast as a F-15A please
1 Like
Didn’t MiG-29 get nerfed 1 patch after its intro and is still in a nerfed state right now? Also did it not take them 1 year to introduce changes to the gimped Su-27 airframe?
1 Like