Then why haven’t they fixed it? Lol its been brought up a million times in the forums…so yeah its bias
So you’re claiming NATO bias because NATO tanks are stronger than the BVM… okay.
3 Likes
they fixed it, and then added spall liners to NATO tanks, making them far more survivable than the T-series, so the ‘bias’ is tipped towards NATO MBTs right now, sorry to burst you bubble :D
1 Like
As someone who currently enjoys 27SM way more than the entire US air toptier all I can say is - screw the flight model, screw the cobra button, just the radar is already very much worth it.
I feel like 27SM hits a pretty good spot in terms of TWR, and according to statshark at 5000m alt in terms of acceleration in a straight line the difference between 27SM and 30SM is just shy of 100km/h after 40ish seconds. So if 27SM is decent and reaches 1500km/h after X amount of time, 30SM would have reached 1400-1410. Again, just the radar is already well worth the tradeoff. Not to mention, like, everything else.
Also, given how “current” 27SM was conjured from a mishmash of several SM’s over a span of a few updates, there is a non-zero chance we could see that again at some point.
Yeah thats fair besides the Abrams and its DU Armor inserts that hasn’t been added
Followed by France, the USA, Japan, and arguably Britain. I prefer the Challenger 2’s over something like the T-90M.
When we get the F-22 first
Ok and? my point still stands, r73 is infact not easy to flare under 2km.
Well if the USA mains can’t get free easy kills, then they nerf everyone else till they can.
Then why is the R-77 so bad? It was very comparable to the AMRAAM, while the R-77-1 was better than it.
“iRL performance is all that matters”
Then, why, does the Abrams have a 5.0 sec reload which has been proven to be inaccurate ?
Why is the AZ loader on the T-64B/80U,UK,BVM etc not 6.0 secs like irl?
Kinda weird eh? It’s been proven from cyclogram data
But it’s realistic
It hasn’t been.
Because Gaijin hasn’t modelled mechanics that make it perform more accurately as far as I know.
1 Like
What? just because RU main has to actually aim weak spot instead of point any direction that isn’t turret cheek make them OP instantly? lol
Find a true combat load for the abrams then lol
Reloads are a balancing thing for the most part, though the reload speed needs to be possible for the tank, So it has been proven that the Abrams can reload in 5 seconds and in fact manual loaders can be fired even faster
2 Likes
Don’t deny the fact that the Strv 122s and the 2A6/2A7 are the best tanks in the whole game. Doing so would be dishonest.
3 Likes
Care to prove your bold claim? That I have disproven before?
I need to prove that Abrams can be reloaded in 5 seconds to disapprove your claim that they can’t be despite providing no evidence yourself?
1 Like
Prove it then and find some primary sources and submit a bug report
Leopard 2 with the same exact manual over-rides for the blast door, as well as same position for ammo storage.
1 Like