兵工学报是student paper?真的假的?

既然三期弹的说明书和杆长都是”涉密资料“,那我发论文总行吧,依旧nab,依旧学生论文

11 Likes


论文大概可以概括为这个,感兴趣可以去看看

3 Likes

这谁能绷住

2 Likes

不想给直说,我们好讨奸

1 Like

gaijin:都写了《工兵学报》了,那肯定是学生报刊,不给过,not a bug,你能拿我怎么样。

1 Like

兵工学报有官网的(海外可以访问),你去直接丢官网的说明给他
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.10.003
这篇的官网链接: 兵工学报
官网对杂志的介绍英文版:Acta Armamentarii, a Chinese monthly journal, was first published in 1979. The journal is supervised by China Association for Science and Technology, sponsored by China Ordnance Society,and edited and published by Editorial Board of Acta Armamentarii. The Journal is included in all important domestic databases,and also collected by Engineering Index (EI, USA), Chemical Abstracts (CA, USA), Science Abstracts (SA, UK), Abstract Journal (AJ, Russia), and Current Bibliography on Science and Technology(CBST).Acta Armamentarii has been selected into the journal Of Ordnance Science and Technology (Weapons Industry) Field Of High Quality Scientific and Technological Periodical Classification Catalogue (2022 edition), ranking T1, and the journal of Automotive Engineering Field of High Quality Scientific and technological Periodical classification Catalogue, ranking T2.

The aim of publication of Acta Armamentarii is to report the latest academic achievements in the field of ordnance science and technology. The papers about fundamental research, applied basic research, applied research and engineering technology are published in the journal. The journal focuses on the ordnance science and technology subjects, including armor, launch, guidance, ammunition, underwater ordnance, protection, weapon information technology, energetic material, combustion and detonation, ballistics, fire control and command control, unmanned equipment, ordnance material and manufacturing, and ordnance supporting technology (experiment, metrology, detection, reliability and safety).

3 Likes

脸都不要了


1986年的大学讲师和1958年的大学教授联合南理工的实验室在由中国科协主管、中国兵工学会主办,是兵器领域最具学术影响力的,在《中国科技期刊引证报告》和《中国学术期刊影响因子年报》中,综合影响力指标在兵器领域期刊中均排名第一,是兵器学科唯一持续多年获得“百种中国杰出学术期刊”奖的期刊,入选中国科协卓越行动计划二期项目中文领军期刊中文期刊中发表的原理性研究成果居然是“student paper”吗
就像我之前交副油箱的issue说一个在某所当军代表的作者文章是student 一样

实话本来就没报啥期望,三期弹弹体照片和说明书(说明书示意图是我所知唯一提到尾部有碳化钨的资料)被gaijin判为涉密资料,你在论坛和issue发了都是秒删,只能单提交个论文试试。我正文也只是说老钟有这种技术,对穿深有提升,可以用在dtc10身上 。主要我本来以为会是nei,让你提供三期弹采用这种结构的资料,结果理由是学生论文,这谁绷得住

What did bro leak now

前面的前推蛋也是相同差不多情况,直接上传的论文,但是不是学生论文nab,被通过后也是以涉密为由删除了。
如果要再次冲三期蛋的话不知道会不会还有人说m829a3都是直接套三角凭什么你要还原。

前推弹是什么,能不能细说下

I really don’t see a reason not to if this is properly backed up with valid sourcing

upvote from me

1 Like

no way around it, snail always acts like an autocrat

2 Likes

This was already done by players before. Even though Gaijin considered those materials to be leaks, they still implemented them in the game. The problem is, some of the stuff they adopted is incorrect, yet they won’t allow players to use those same materials to argue back