Strengthening requires information, and Weakening doesn't need a reason

In the rating discussion thread, there was quite a heated discussion about Leclerc, Challenger, Merkava, Ram and 99A/VT4, but why didn’t Gaijin respond to this? Why do so many tanks with much lower performance than the L2A7V and Strv122, as well as BVM, have to compete with them? I’m a Chinese faction player, and I’m very confused by this question: why do so many faction players have the same problem but are just arguing with each other? Is there any point in striking out a weaker one among the weak tanks? Why can’t we all ask Gaijin to strengthen these weak tanks, at least I need to know why Gaijin is silent about this, why he refuses to strengthen these guys with obvious problems.

As far as I know, the armor of the Leclerc and the Ram, the armor-piercing shells of the Challenger, the reload time of all the top Chinese tanks, the protection of the VT4 and the combat performance of the Merkava have been discussed many times and over again. Players have a lot of ideas about this: send Leclerc a shard-apdsfs, fix the armor bugs of the VT4 and 99A, reduce the reload time of Chinese tanks, reasonably strengthen the armor of the Challenger and Ram, and reduce the combat level of the Merkava tank. But so far, only a small number of questions have been answered and explained positively.

1 Like