Storm Warning - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

I mean gameplay wise it’s going to play exactly like the AH-64A. It’ll be okay to grind heli pve (ignoring that you can grind helis using tanks now for a moment) while it’ll get it’s face stomped in by any 11.3+ SPAA with at least 2 braincells.

Good thing I’m going to be spading the HQ-17, so I very much welcome some more free RP.

Meanwhile I’m here with my fake Eurocopter that I bought on sale for Bastille day

1 Like

I mean the AH-64D in the US gameplay wise is like the AH-64A. Yeah you get the radar but you still have to pop to identify and lase targets.

1 Like

True, which is why it’s so incredibly meh at top tier.

1 Like
I got a "small" suprise addition right here

This text will be hidden

Yes iam a Japanese Fanboy who wants his F2

11 Likes

Yes! My friend Yes, that is the way!

1 Like

I do want the F-2A.
I’m a heavy fighter person through and through (F-15 and Su-27 my beloved) but it would be nice having another option compared to just the F-15J(M).

2 Likes

It has the AGM-114K, instead of AGM-114B, and it has the option to use extra countermeasures on the mouter pylons instead of ATAS

It’s a good thing that we’re not asking for that, then. Stop acting like we are.

To me, it looks like it’s been asked. Please before making claims read the whole convo.

Spoiler

3 Likes

taking the extra countermeasures is suicide instead of atas though. Meanwhile it won’t perform much different from the AH-64A even if it has 114K instead of 114B.

Dude’s got a sick Flanker video and Su-33 video too. Good edit.

Spoiler

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYJ2H5Enxw0

2 Likes

can we get some lower br stuff like me 262 hg1

1 Like

Hehe

Spoiler

IMG_5715

2 Likes

gepard does not use AHEAD

Anyone had chance to test out those new French Hammers on Dev?

Trying to gauge how awful it’s going to be on the receiving end of.

just not bad or good, normal FNF. The laser one could be interesting.

tbf I get what Shay means, whenever a valid argument has been made that isnt adding LOAL its normally shot down as because A. “LOAL” or B. “but it can see through smoke.” Mode 2 isnt LOAL and the whole smoke thing can be easily negated by adding the chaff element to nato smoke grenades. I already hear the response, but not every nation has chaff in their smoke grenades and I will simply respond with a quote

5 Likes

and for brimstone, it has another problem, it can’t be controlled accurately. the radar will lock anything it want in it’s fov, and you don’t know what it locked and can’t change the missile’s lock.

in mode 2 the missile is slaved to the targeting pod and requires a lock before launch, it can change targets in flight if the target were to drive behind a dead tank for example, what you are saying is the LOAL or Mode 1 where it will lock onto the first target in its FOV