Storm Warning - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

The new FAB-500T UMPK has a drop speed of about mach 2 afaik, so that one will be gtg. ISN’T TV guided however like I thought. GNSS only.

oh nice, if thats the case i think i’ll be running them in the center undercarriage pylon for sure. The 3000 UMPK is pretty nice but that speed restriction really is a killer, i think i would rather be able to stay fast over having the bigger explosion radius myself.

1 Like

Again mate, I think everything you’re saying is reasonable, and I can’t fault the rationale in it.

I’m just off the firm stance that ‘unlocked’ Brimmy’s so to speak have got to be a no no until everyone, GB/GER/ITA included, get something that can reasonably counter the thing launching it from the ground.

You’re very correct to point out to me things like KH-38 / AGM-65 being examples of what I don’t want Brimmy’s to be, and how it can be perceived as a rules for thee but not for me situation. I just don’t want to go down the slippery slope of ‘x’ gets something that ruins the game, so everyone else should be able to ruin the game too lol. At that point, there’s no game worth playing left.

Once those longer range SAM’s come (hopefully early) next year, then I’ll be accepting with taking off some of Brimmy’s shackles.

Referring to the whole and meaning the majority or a lot is a very common thing that everyone does in some capacity. When you say “you do that all the time”, for example, you don’t literally mean that, but rather that that person does it a lot. This is the same thing. The majority of people asking for the Brimstone to be buffed want it to be FnF, not LOAL.

Hypothesis:

Last time they touched AAB/ARB, they broke stuff in air sim.

This update is likely gonna be super rushed.

They’re FINALLY fixing the stupid auto ticket bleed in ARB.

However, sim EC kind of relies on “auto ticket bleed” for gaining points as the team that gets “cover bombers/attackers/survey plane” and stuff.

Assumption: Sim EC is gonna end up broken and objectives will only give point to the “destroy” team.

1 Like

I think LOAL will be added at one point even though it was denied. There was word in the Q&A they’re going to implement heavier AA so weapons like Brimstone could be offset by these very long range AA systems. LOAL can’t be that effective if you can’t even get close enough (depending on what type of long-range SAM system is implemented and how it is implemented). It’s typical for something to be denied for a while until they develop a workaround or test it. I mean look at FnF, that went through its period of denial.

Excerpt from Q&A

Q: In Ground Realistic Battles, top attack aircraft are capable of dominating ground vehicles for the most part. Are there any plans to do something about this in 2025?
A: According to our data, the balance at the top ranks of ground battles is noticeably shifted towards aviation and helicopters, and this balance has become even worse with the introduction of top aircraft this year. The situation where aircraft can attack tanks from a safe distance with impunity makes gameplay more boring for aviation and less fair for ground vehicles, a similar situation is with helicopters equipped with long-range fast ATGMs, or “fire-and-forget” ATGMs.

To counter these types of threats, more powerful systems are needed that have the ability to fire at several targets at once and a wide search sector in both azimuth and elevation. The most advanced SAM system currently presented in the game only partially meets these requirements, so we’ll move towards heavier systems for all nations, including those components of which are located on several chassis. Of course, we’ll have to solve the problem of controlling these types of SAM systems, but we’re already having thoughts on the matter.

In turn, there are plans to add new capabilities for aircraft. And while we do not consider anti-radiation missiles (ARM) a priority and necessity, more advanced capabilities of ESM from on board an aircraft, i.e. more accurate determination of the active radar position, are in our fairly close plans.

So the update is due on 20th?

  • You take a KH38
  • You remove half its speed
  • You add a bit of lofting (it feels like it lofts a bit more than KH38, but not by much)

There you have it

And you can copy pasta it 2 times, one with GPS and one with Laser.

The laser one can act as GPS too, except if you get inside 20km of your target, you can guide it precisely near the end of its flight.

I feel like the GPS + Laser ones are going to be the strongest, even if they are not F&F.
IR ones would be stronger if the missile was faster, but imo slow IR missiles tends to be less reliable, as things can get in the way by accident (dead thing, house, trees), and they are easier to intercept for AA.

Laser ones can be launched as GPS, you can forget about them for a while, reposition, and laze whatever there is at the last moment. pretty strong imo.

In any case : it won’t be a fun party for whoever is on the receiving end, that’s for sure

1 Like

I always love people when they moan about C&P there are some hilarious takes like this one here

“There are leos in every tree,” yes of course it will be because it one of the most exported MBT’s in the world.

“Every tree will be getting the M44” well duh last time I’ve check the US was a major arms exporter and had a huge military industrial complex.

9 Likes

updates never drop on a thursday or friday because nobody wants to do Debugging on the weekend

Monday or tuesday are more likely

???

From Gszabi’s sheet:

Spoiler

image

7 Likes

why does everyone get the M44?

  • everyone needed a new SPG
  • looked like a fine tank on paper
  • cheap
  • the US made a lot of them
5 Likes

chance for a Thursday update is 1/5 so once a year

I heavily doubt they’ll release an update on thursday the week before Christmas

Oh no a cheap tank that the US felt like they could get a ton of money from and covering the cost of the development from it.

: 0

I remember more advantages

  • Everyone in NATO (+ friends) can share ammo now
  • Easier maintenance as the chassis was already in use with most
2 Likes

yeah 1/5. that 1/5 updates last year was air superiority which was, drumroll please, the december update.

Except for the fact that the M44s and the majority of the non-German and Swedish Leopard 2s aren’t needed

the chance for a Release on tuesday is twice as high, for Wednesday it’s still 50% higher than thursday

I don’t see a reason to expect thursday as the release date based on the data you showed

and then remember the 20th is next friday, and that chance is extremely low

the entire game isn’t needed

it’s just a fun thing to play around with and so is the M44

it doesn’t take anything away from anyone and it’s a good Addition for a Vehicle in hostorical use for most nations

4 Likes

There isn’t a bases when it comes to needed, if gaijin felt like it they will add it.
Most nations will kick off sooner or later and wanting to get their M44

3 Likes