F-111F armed AGM-130A only, maybe
The F-15E used AGM-130A & AGM-130C
2 Israel fighter aircraft only access AGM-142 Popeye
But aussie F-111C armed AGM-142
They can’t model a Hummel out of the Hornisse but can pump out endless Tigers
When i ask for Stug IV, people ask what’s the need but Tiger with logs or kinky fishnets are ok
rant
/s
1 Like
wait till you here about the XM2001 Crusader
Reminds me one certain tank in Nordic tree, forgot the name of it… anyone remember? Something on U or with U in it name
Clearly you are talking about the Kalmar Union or the Glorious Bornholm
Unfortunately this information is rather unknown to the public. Until the information does become public, all we ask is for a more generous estimate of spikes to be carried in the hull. 4 in total is quite a low number, and a high number of spikes isn’t game-breaking as seen on the Freccia. Please at least consider upping the amount given the sheer size of the vehicle and the available space within it.
5 Likes
Any news regarding the J10B or J11B yet? Or still nothing hinting towards them?
Some people said that we will only get the J10B for this update
1 Like
Any possibility of Rafale losing its AESA radar?
1 Like
So whats the current drama, EFT’s producers clearly dont know their vehicle and thus arent reputable sources and same with BAE, anyone else?
5 Likes
Meanwhile some russian blog site is accepted as source
6 Likes
Doubt it, wouldn’t make sense imo, it would make more sense for other 13.7 vehicles to get better radar if possible though
You do know what else was trialed along with U, right? U wasn’t the only tank.
U was an exception thats it. Leave it or else its a floodgate.
As a Puma and Vilkas enjoyeeer, I agree with your statement!
Give us more than 4!
lol true
Too late, the precedent was already made and thus can and will be exploited by “I want it”. Besides, it would be a unique variant, different from operated by Ukraine and/or Thailand
I would wait maybe one or two more days.
It’s reasonable to expect J-10B only, because of the addition of Rafale and Eurofighter.
J-10B would actually make the J-10 competitive against those two monsters.
I’m glad I don’t make any reports, seems like absolute pain
Ive been waiting months for the Finnish Sotkas (T34, both models) to get their weight reduced by .2t as gaijin copy pasted the Soviet Spaded weight one the finnish models despite them not having the add on armor. So you have a T34, with no track guards, nor track armor, so why does it weigh the same as the T34’s with the add on armor and why do i need a source to fix a problem that can be clearly scene. Regardless i added a source, a source that uses T34’s with their full armor which gets us to the base weight. Again they should weight about .2-.1t less than a standard T34
2 Likes
But Pakistan is not even a proper subtree of China … atleast dont even have a subtree line like SA, Hun or Finland.
Now you’re asking China to get something Pakistan trialed? That’s not the precedent.
Sweden is the main tree. T80 U was trialed by them. It was not trialed by Finland. Get it?
If China trialed any Leopard 2 when they were collaborating with KMW during 80s then that would’ve been similar scenario. Or if they trialed any later Soviet tanks then that would’ve been similar scenario.
Instead the Pak’s unique T-80UD is something I want to get added for China.
1 Like