Meh, but happy for the people that wanted it so badly, I guess
Ewwwww
M109 all over again
Where Abbot and/or AS-90?
More Alpha Jets, yay, but also more F-5s, meh
2 Likes
Yet most nations don’t get stomped in like 5min into the match lol.
Competitive? with 30% winrates? Going against Russia 99% of the matches with Su-34 and Su-25SM3 outranging ADATS by double or triple the range? While also fighting against Germany or Sweden with best tanks in the game meanwhile being in cardboard Abrams that takes single shot to disable completely thanks to their fake internal components? Even the 120S with M60 hull is more survivable than the top tier Abrams. Or are you referring to the Apaches not only doesn’t stand any chance against Pantsirs but can’t even have MAW and Stingers at the same and is stuck with one of the slowest heli missiles in the game.
1 Like
You guys either cut this conversation here and take it elsewhere or this thread will inevitably end up locked, same as yesterday.
4 Likes
Because the good players tend to stay well away from america
Please lock it until dev server comes out
It isn’t, though masquerading a fictional designation for a missile that never existed in this Swedish air force doesn’t make it realistic.
And that’s where there is contention. The plane can absolutely carry it, but to add it to the Swedish variant while trying to play it off as if it’s a Swedish licensed missile is wrong.
lol bro its just a game, you take it toooooooooo serious lol
1 Like
how else am I gonna get my entertainment thooooo
please, my bot can’t keep up
1 Like
No point playing your shiny new Su-33 if your team is full of level 10s with a dream
Im not talking about relevancy right now. The f16 and Mig29 brought a new phase of warthunder and brought so many new players to the game
Exactly thats why I advocate for more additions like sepv3 to bring some players back but gaijin just keeps adding more and more premiums to US and just throwing fuel on to the fire.
1 Like
As did the phantom and mig-21 before it, what’s your point?
Are there any aviation innovations planned for China? Maybe they’re still in the works and you just couldn’t show them on the stream?
not like its ever gonna recover
@Smin1080p_WT If the AESA on Rafale is true, can we get word from devs at some point in the near future about status of F-2 as it was said to only not be added because of AESA radar and weaponry (at the time, which since we have AAM-3 and AAM-4)?
While Japan mains are happy about Thai sub addition, it does feel a bit wrong that, if true, AESA is introduced on a more capable fighter before a highly requested aircraft like the F-2 (which arguably was only held back so far because of AESA radar).
8 Likes
You missed hungarian strela
1 Like
Just wait for dev
the F3R from what I know doesnt have an AESA