and the abrams has a really bad armor model
1 Like
Because American mains suck dude
1 Like
No investigation, no reliability of his word.
when you just play russian and stay in tier VI, your accuse about American top tier players doesn’t make any sense.
1 Like
Just USSR need 80% avarage winrate on +12.0 BR.
If u not red = u dead.
2 Likes
vote added guys！let’s vote，gaijin MUST stop what they done！
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Agree, if gaijin still going to update this, the M1 and Leopard will be unplayable…this change suck
VOTE!
GAIJIN need to know WHAT R THEY DOING!
It doesn’t take a genius to figure out US players suck at top tier.
I think you must do it public.
Spoiler
All abrams, Leopards 2a4, 2a5, 2a6 - yes, i think so. Strv 122/leopard 2a7 still be the best, but you will suffer very much.
GAIJIN don’t even know how to rebut.
can only say a bug report is not a bug report. hahahah
the situation is clear now. only NATO’s turret busket is a traversing gear.but Russian’s turret busket is not a traversing gear.And refuse to accept any rebuttal
3 Likes
Imo, we don’t need any modules on mbt. Just remove hydraulic pump and autoloader. And do not add turret basket.
Maybe gaijin logic is if basket get hit, the metal bend and jams rotation drive
Rotation drive isnt on the turret basket, and theres backups for it
What in sayingnit gaijin think if turret basket deform, turret get jamm
metal on basket isnt connected to le turret ring
man
cant get good shit these day
This entire change is pain in the ass
no reason to be added, massive frustration
Gaijin has a different way of thinking than we do
We need to stop them and fix them properly!!
1 Like
Indeed.
The new modules are great.
Turret baskets are great- IF implemented correctly; which is as thin aluminum plating made specifically to protect the crew from spall; NOT to generate more, and it should most definitely NOT be a part of the traverse mechanisms.