I don’t know what to tell you man. My examples to back up my point are my profile and my replays, both of which can be looked up with ease. Doesn’t really get more concrete than that.
Your example is you coming in here first post to side with someone who merely statshamed me, and you do the same taking that same stance…
Sorry, but for a first post, this is definitely putting your foot in it, because my stats have nothing at all to do with the point made.
1 Like
Damn dude, you are a skillzord. But i see that you do not play abramses, but rather end up on 5 rank. (or maybe i just don’t see it)
Would you try abramses and show how you do with it?
For me it was the opposite. Always liked the Abrams, did decent in it as well. When I was grinding the Leclerc I expected it to just be a worse Abrams but I have been doing really well in it, even better than in my Abrams somehow.
It’s nice to face the A-10C in the Pantsir/ItO/HQ17. It’s easy to kill and almost kind of relaxing in a way.
1 Like
you want to see what top tier is? here you go Waste of time playing Top Tier as N.A.T.O When gaijrubles Artificially Nerfs NATO. ( this is also proof that gaijin nerfs the accuracy of the U.S 30MM chaingun as it shouldnt spread at this distance. and this is me firing down at russian tanks.
Then how am I managing to do exactly what you say is impossible? Is this something lost in translation or something? The chinese guy said that hovering around 45% winrate with stuff like 3.3-5.7 germany means that you suck, and you said winrate only has to do with the teams you get. I provided both a counterpoint and evidence that completely contradicts what you said, and you just haven’t acknowledged it. Your stats have everything to do with the point made.
Didn’t say it was ‘impossible’. You took all that time to come up with that bomb.
Relay back what point it relates to, then we’ll see if you’ve got the right end of the stick.
I bought ue1 last Christmas and I got my bvm last month. In the first month, all my teammates are ue1 like me. What we do is just hold W into the point, kill or die. This is just ok for ue1, but playing M1 likes this is totally not a good choice, M1 is hard for noobs like me.
All 15 people playing m1 in the right way will lead to the defeats. Any penetration at his neck is lethal. So many pro guys I met play US like this, rush with HSTV and got f-15/f-16 in the sky. Then use M1 to shoot enemies 1km away. The problem is who is capturing the point and push the frontlines to enemies’s home? No one! M1 is weak at this, and pro guys all knows this.
The Leclerc has a poor round and isn’t being given the proper reload rate or armor.
GBU-39 says hello.
Does KDR in games reflect winrate, or does that lean more towards team effort?
Great question! Kill-to-Death Ratio (KDR) and winrate are related, but they measure different aspects of gameplay.
- KDR focuses on individual performance, reflecting how many enemies a player has eliminated compared to how many times they’ve been eliminated. It’s a common metric in many shooter games and can indicate a player’s skill in combat1.
- Winrate, on the other hand, measures the percentage of matches a player or team wins out of the total matches played. It’s more indicative of overall team success and effectiveness.
While a high KDR can contribute to a higher winrate, it doesn’t guarantee it. Team effort, strategy, and cooperation are crucial for winning matches, especially in team-based games1. So, while KDR is important, it’s just one piece of the puzzle when it comes to achieving a high winrate.
Damn I’m loving AI…
1 Like
hmm i wonder what could have happeed from 2019 that made the u.s win rates go so low…
I mean I wouldn’t say poor, sure it’s not as good as on the Abrams, but 575 is still okay. Also it has a constant 5 second reload, unlike the Abrams which loses that reload after getting penned once.
I don’t think either of them is bad, I just somehow do better in the Leclerc than in the Abrams for some reason.
Assuming I stay still in spawn lol.
Thanks for the Ad Hominem box :)
3 Likes
It’s usable, but you should be rewarded for low penetration like the Strv 122B series.
That’s if the tank doesn’t get its turret ring and engine taken out with 2 or more crew at once lol
I don’t dumb them all in spawn. I have more than enough to cover popular positions and reposition points. Even then, I can evade most missiles at a distance.
Even if you do move, most others don’t.
No one takes you seriously after your crash out and past statements
im not saying anything… but uh…
the same pattern
ts almost as if one series of tank IS BETTER THAN THE OTHERS
Its like tanks with upgraded armor profiles
ARE DOING STATISTCIALLY BETTER. THAN TANKS… WITH THE SAME EXACT PROTECTION.
as if i take half of you people seriously esp the people that same " abrams is the best tank in the game "
US Main discovers their winrates are a result of the players.
Plus if your team is dead NO TANK is saving you.
2 Likes
Abrams is the second best top tier, beaten out by the Leopard 2’s.
2 Likes