I only see hitting the joint between front and up plate, if it was a bounce I would also think unlucky shot but it clearly showing that the shot skatered which it should not given the pen and the wheight of the ammo.
which case is the right one ?
A. Battle replay (Crew intact tank critically damaged)
B. Replay hit analysis (crew and tank intact)
C. Protection analysis ( all crew dead - tank destroyed)
1 Like
Complete Bull Crap 7.7 Rus is Op as Hell you have
IS-4 at 7.7 completely pure Opness non can touch him except 8+ or Gang it
T-54-57 and T-44-100 again amazing Med low profile , trolly armor and ofc Nuke ammo
Obj 906 sure again Magic Vechicle
AAA you have choice to do every think with ZSU 57-2 you can even play as TD supporter
IS-3 and IS6 again amazing Tanks
BMP-1 sure
Obj 268 troll armor Nuke gun
Dunno if you know this but comparing to British 7.7 they can’t even pene you up front except light and AAA Rus Tanks saying is hard to play them is understatement
Low tier Rus is not different APHE is broken every one know about idiotic Spalling that have nothing too do with Reality
Actualy 1 of the most broken idiotic Ammo is BR-365 can go through Track of Tiger II , Ferdinands , T-29,Jumbo multiple reports send nothing fixed years passing T-34-85 go up in BR but the broken ammo still is in Use
Armor in Rus extremely huge chance to richoshet in low br’s is a menace weak spots are to small comparing to other nations
So you have Nuke Ammo and Idiotic Armor vs tanks with High Pene but no spalling at all not to mention spalling stop at first module or death crew just lol
Then again you have Rus tanks crampet inside with crew that should die but they survive huge survivability in crampet Tanks just lol
Rus is easy Mode
1 Like
It seems that when I play the T34s enemies are just unlucky, it happens ;-)
**all shots are between 150m to 250m
2 Likes
Here we go again…lol!!
First shot to T-72 Turms …HIT!!
Hit analysis …shell passed trough the tank and no crew and system damaged… (LOL!!!)
Protection analysis (Driver , gunner dead and many systems damaged)
Second shot with tow-2 …HIT!!
Hit analysis… no crew and system damaged… (LOL!!)
Protection analysis (commander , gunner dead and systems damaged)
1 Like
every shot after the first was a killing shot according to hit analysis.
I even checked the replay to see if I was actually hiting or he was a ghost or something.
8 freacking shots with APBCHE - HE - APHE !
The damage model in this game has always been something that needed tweaking, but over the last few years it’s started to break really badly. If you play more than 4 games it’s impossible not to lose your tank in a game because your shot didn’t do what it was supposed to, ending up with an absurd ricochet or penetration with minimal damage, regardless of penetration or armor. I think only HE works correctly, after that APHE don’t usually give many misses, after that the other bullets are a lottery where the game ends up deciding what you’re going to do, regardless of the skill or advantage of the vehicle and position on the map.
Just asking…shouldn’t an ammo explosion have occured ? The amount of his APFSDS ammo is reduced instantly after the missile hit to minus one (24 to 23) but he only caught fire…
Hit analysis
Ammo reducing 24 to 23…
APDSFS on the T72 is a two stage ammo.
If you hit the projectile it would not go off, but if the charge in the autoloader get hits it will create a a catastrophic flying turret , or it should.
Got it , thx
Nyet, Tovarish. For you see, Ivan ammo circle is extra armor for tank. Not easy to make explode.
Why, you ask? Simple, Tovarish.
Sekrit Dokuments.
1 Like
Today…1000 lbs bomb direct hit to a T-10 …Critical hit with crew and ammo intact
(Server replay screenshots my view)
(Server replay screenshots enemy player view)
Hit analysis (client replay)
Dispite that the enemy view server replay screenshots show that its not a direct hit but a very close one (leathal too), the explosion is clear on the back portion of his tank confirming my view server replay and hit analysis screenshots for a direct hit , BUT NO HOPE AGAIN LOL!!
1 Like
Damn… even the childeren know that direct hit with bombs but-out 80% of the time and result in only dmg to tracks (I’ve seen it countless times with Leo2 and other tanks) and you should aim to get the bomb near the tank, not on top of it…
but I guess this thread one of those “copium crusedes”
if you are not joking … it would be nice to see some of these countless times you are mention…
Look for them yourself. Unlike you, I use my free time to relax/play games, not to “collect evidence”, to “prove my point” to some random on the forum.
HA HA HA sure mate …
You are contradicting your self, go play, don’t waste your free time playing smart ass.
It is not the norm, it happens and it’s a bug, here some opened bug reports.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/JsowsozXSxSH
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/CGQ8YzR77vfc
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/8EgnLoBYHMnC
1 Like
Gotta love that moderator answer.
Not a bug, Ferdinand should totally survive 300kg of explosive exploding on top of it.
Working as intended.
Remember the times your crew would die from concussion when falling down a ledge or running into a wall?
Gaijin, just give us hullbreak, so that 183mm HESH or 380mm Sturmtiger rockets don’t simply leave a paint scratch on a tank 🙄
And how those reports, cotradict my statement that the bombs fail to kill (all kinds of) tanks (not just USSR/Russian) on direct hit…???
not “but-out” but bugged-out