specific designs can do a lot of job. if as you say, then OBJ.432 shouldn’t have the armor better than a T-34. after all, the things except armor all have weights, and they are just similar in weights
Prove that the VT5 is correct.
How is picking the VT5 is wrong side the opposing side?
but,it can’t even withstand heavy machine gun fire,it only has 4-5mm and 15mm side armor,frontal lower armor only 10-15mm is impossible,
Thank you. Finally a post that treats me with respect.
I appreciate your perspective, sir!
@我要成为俄罗斯原神糕手
Thank you for your concerns and opinions. I appreciate you and your post.
As I said previously, I’d love to see evidence of this being incorrect.
btw, the 《兵器》and 《现代兵器》 they are journals published by different research institutes under China North Industries Group Corporation Limited. If you consider the content released by research institutes under the parent company of the VT5 manufacturer to be unreliable, then I suggest you buy one yourself.
People have shown evidence to back their claims however you haven’t shown any evidence for proving your stance.
My stance: VT5 is potentially incorrect. Could people help me find evidence of this?
They have already shown you multiple evidence
goooooood
No, I stated my evidence requirements in my original posts.
I said interviews are not helpful, and requirements are not helpful.
I can’t change those standards for one specific vehicle just cause I like it more than any German tank.
I’ll read the interview, and take it seriously for what it is.
I just want to KNOW something, not believe it based on the testimony of others.
no one knows VT5 better than someone, not even VT5 itself
give a reason. I think it’s as real as brochures
especially from its chief designer
Ah yes. Big difference. Either grind for 81days minimum or pay GE. Its essentially a premium with worse rewards
Not to mention the gun elevation problem. So Gaijin thinks they bent the gun past the elevation lock to 20+ degrees? Absolutely hilarious.
hey friends the issue about the elevation is accepted,that is a good start
Is the description in the dvr correct? Can it only withstand heavy machine gun fire?
No lol
The scientific method was hammered into my head at a young age, and my standards for evidence are video, photo* [to an extent], official documentation where relevant.
In the case of armor, I’d prefer official documentation. Schematics are my love and joy in that realm, BUT if classified obvious no one should give it to me.
I’d take video/photos of the armor thickness.
I’d compromise for legally allowed unclassified government documents.
At no point did I argue anything other than existing light tank masses as a concern to find evidence that VT5 is more armored than in-game.
I personally do not care if it gets buffed or not, BUT I will never object to vehicles getting corrected and endorse those attempted to correct vehicles.
At no point did I argue its armor was correct, and I still DO NOT argue that its armor is correct; All I want is information and clarity.
I did a poor job typing that initially, that’s my bad. I was eating pizza and being reckless in my posts.
@南京航空航天大学 Apologies for misunderstandings between us, all I came here for was information seeking, not argument.