Squadron Vehicles: VT5

if you think the interview to the chief designer of VT5 is not evidence, which means "no one knows VT5 better than you "? lol

15 Likes

But when it comes to russian tanks, somehow random websites become solid evidence.

4 Likes

That is the exact opposite of what you said though, you said:

“Oh, and tracks weigh the same no matter the tank design.”

And i said:

“Again, no, highly depends on how the track is designed and the material used.”

How are these even remotely the same argument? they are in stark contrast to one another.

And no comment on the rest of my disagreements?

14 Likes

specific designs can do a lot of job. if as you say, then OBJ.432 shouldn’t have the armor better than a T-34. after all, the things except armor all have weights, and they are just similar in weights

2 Likes

Prove that the VT5 is correct.
How is picking the VT5 is wrong side the opposing side?

image


This is just the turret basket.

The overall layout is obnoxiously wrong

18 Likes

but,it can’t even withstand heavy machine gun fire,it only has 4-5mm and 15mm side armor,frontal lower armor only 10-15mm is impossible,

9 Likes

Thank you. Finally a post that treats me with respect.
I appreciate your perspective, sir!

@我要成为俄罗斯原神糕手
Thank you for your concerns and opinions. I appreciate you and your post.

As I said previously, I’d love to see evidence of this being incorrect.


btw, the 《兵器》and 《现代兵器》 they are journals published by different research institutes under China North Industries Group Corporation Limited. If you consider the content released by research institutes under the parent company of the VT5 manufacturer to be unreliable, then I suggest you buy one yourself.

17 Likes

People have shown evidence to back their claims however you haven’t shown any evidence for proving your stance.

13 Likes

My stance: VT5 is potentially incorrect. Could people help me find evidence of this?

1 Like

They have already shown you multiple evidence

4 Likes

goooooood

Here you are
兵器+2017年01期 - 道客巴巴 和另外 15 个页面 - 个人 - Microsoft​ Edge 2025_3_13 3_08_56

17 Likes

No, I stated my evidence requirements in my original posts.
I said interviews are not helpful, and requirements are not helpful.

I can’t change those standards for one specific vehicle just cause I like it more than any German tank.

I’ll read the interview, and take it seriously for what it is.
I just want to KNOW something, not believe it based on the testimony of others.

2 Likes

no one knows VT5 better than someone, not even VT5 itself

2 Likes

give a reason. I think it’s as real as brochures
especially from its chief designer

Ah yes. Big difference. Either grind for 81days minimum or pay GE. Its essentially a premium with worse rewards

Not to mention the gun elevation problem. So Gaijin thinks they bent the gun past the elevation lock to 20+ degrees? Absolutely hilarious.

4 Likes

hey friends the issue about the elevation is accepted,that is a good start

9 Likes