SPO-30/SPO-32 L-150 Soviet/Russian Third Generation RWR 'Dead Zone' Issue

Machinery of War Discussion Aircraft
31

Your argument
1.‘±30degs limit’ description means ‘the system can only detect signal within the limit’.
2.SPO-32 has this description.
1+2->3. SPO-32 can only detect signal within ±30degs.

I gave a counterexample to your proposition 1 from SPO-15 document, so you cannot obtain proposition 3 is true. What’s the problem?

32

that you dont have a source

SPO-32 =/= SPO-15

image
image1088×447 62.2 KB

33
  1. The disk is a antenna;
  2. The other type antenna cannot be fitted into the disk
  3. SPO-15 gave an existing example, that it’s a planar spiral antenna
    1+2+3=>4. The disk is an antenna if(3) and only if(2) it’s a planar spiral antenna.
  4. If it is, it receive signals from high elevation.
34

Say what ever you want. I’m busy.

35

IDK if you understood that, but THE SPO-32 IS NOT THE SPO-15. If you want an analogy, you cannot say that x = 1 by “saying that y = 1, therfore x = 1”. You need to specificaly demonstrate that x = 1.

36

Angular coverage for spo-15 is the same as l-150 at ±30. I don’t get why you’re trying to argue using spo-15.

image
image1179×1639 658 KB

37

±90 with prolongation. I have no idea what this means.
image

1 Like
38

where is that from?

seems like a book?

39

I think ive also seen another document where it stats modifications can be made.

Let me dig it up.

1 Like
40

17b2210b588192513f96968101ec3f2440847266
17b2210b588192513f96968101ec3f24408472661817×828 122 KB

Могут отсутствовать → May be absent
(Hint to why many have vertical sensor absent)

This document does say it allows modifications.

Probably backing up whatever ralin’s got. Not sure let me ask where this is from also.

1 Like
41

probably becasue it uses some modular standart

see Su-30MKM where they added on a non russian MAW

1 Like
42

👍

43

here an example
image

https://web.archive.org/web/20041017221958/http://www.rusarm.ru/products/af/mig29smt.htm

1 Like
44

image

45

Prolongation still sounds like a different term than just an elevation sensor.

46

what specific sub version is 16m? what vehicle is that for?

47

su-25sm3. I have only heard this phrase from him.

1 Like
48

Again,

Your argument
1.‘±30degs limit’ description means ‘the system can only detect signal within the limit’.
2.SPO-32 has this description.
1+2->3. SPO-32 can only detect signal within ±30degs.

I gave a counterexample to your proposition 1 from SPO-15 document, so you cannot obtain proposition 3 is true. What’s the problem?

I don’t need to make a new proposition. I only need to negate an existing one. (More specifically, the proposition 1. SPO-15 has this description in document, but still can detect high elevation signal.)

49

What’s the link of the website? I want to dig in technical details.

50

Did they described algorithms of signal processing or something like that? Maybe inside the azimuth precise antenna(Пеленгатора) ?
Lately, I’ve detailedly viewed the document of SPO-15, indeed, very interesting! I want to know how people do things after the cold war. Don’t panic, I’m not asking for secret information! I’m just a fan of these things.