https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/323lwC5kQFIf
Anyone who are not satisfied with current ‘dead zone’ configuration and want to make a rational argument, please check my deduction above, in the late reply of the issue. If you agreed, please find someway to support it (IDK how to get these suggestions checked by developers.)
Try to DM a tech mod or you could ask Smin to forward the report for review, higher chances of it being looked at by devs :)
Is Smin referred to user ’ Smin1080p_WT’?
Because it should be ±30.
As far as I can tell, some russian helicopters have expanded rwr deadzones, but not planes (other than maybe su-25, not conclusive)
reason
iam not but i can accept that it is how its supposed to be
you need sources and not wishful thinking for a bug report
The screenshots I taken for the comment ot that bug report(the report itself is not mine) are taken from sources:
1.Бортовой комплекс самолетовождения, прицеливания и управления самолетом МиГ-29Б
2.Станция-предупреждения-об-облучении-СПО-15
3.http://library.voenmeh.ru/jirbis2/files/materials/ifour/book2/book_on_main_page/15.13.2.htm
4.The characteristics of planar spiral antenna can be found anywhere on the internet. It’s science.
The detailed deduction will be written later on this forum.
edit: The components of SPO-32 can be find here:
all your “sources” are for the SPO-15 and not SPO-32
so you have nothing
The sources are for the characteristics of the antenna, which is inherited by SPO-32.
The SPO-32 photo is everywhere.
I have nothing? I have logic, which you don’t.
SPO-32 uses different antennas
SPO-32 antenna:
SPO-15 antenna:
SPO-32 antenna:
SPO-15 antenna:
you dont
if you had logic you would have looked at the jets with the SPO-15 and their upgraded variants that got the SPO-32
1.If it’s an antenna(with the same design as SPO-15), then it can only be a planar spiral antenna.
2.If it’s a planar spiral antenna, it has the following gain pattern.
3.If it has the following gain pattern, it receives signals from high elevation angles.
Which part don’t you understand? If you want to attack the first sentence, you should point out, that it’s not an antenna, or it’s an antenna with some else type.
you still havent posted a single source about the SPO-32 also known as the L-150 Pastel
