probably becasue it uses some modular standart
see Su-30MKM where they added on a non russian MAW
1 Like
👍
here an example
https://web.archive.org/web/20041017221958/http://www.rusarm.ru/products/af/mig29smt.htm
1 Like
Prolongation still sounds like a different term than just an elevation sensor.
what specific sub version is 16m? what vehicle is that for?
su-25sm3. I have only heard this phrase from him.
1 Like
Again,
Your argument
1.‘±30degs limit’ description means ‘the system can only detect signal within the limit’.
2.SPO-32 has this description.
1+2->3. SPO-32 can only detect signal within ±30degs.
I gave a counterexample to your proposition 1 from SPO-15 document, so you cannot obtain proposition 3 is true. What’s the problem?
I don’t need to make a new proposition. I only need to negate an existing one. (More specifically, the proposition 1. SPO-15 has this description in document, but still can detect high elevation signal.)
What’s the link of the website? I want to dig in technical details.
Did they described algorithms of signal processing or something like that? Maybe inside the azimuth precise antenna(Пеленгатора) ?
Lately, I’ve detailedly viewed the document of SPO-15, indeed, very interesting! I want to know how people do things after the cold war. Don’t panic, I’m not asking for secret information! I’m just a fan of these things.
Well you could indeed negate the existing proposition but you will have to do it by providing specific proof FOR THE SPO-32 NOT FOR THE SPO-15, BECAUSE THISE ARE 2 COMPLETLY DIFFERENT DEVICE (so yes, using the SPO-15 as an exemple is irrelevent)
1 Like
“Issue” when it’s a historical matter? Next you’re gonna be saying that Su-30SM2 should have ~125 degrees in azimuth coverage with it’s radar irl…
2 Likes
Yes and lore accurate Flankers can pull 126° of AoA without warm-up.
1 Like
That’s without canards, it’s ~180° w/ Canards.
I only know my mother is a human, so is your mother a dog?
is it ~125°?
Because there’s difference. You will need the disk antenna for specific high elevation measurement.
DIsk - planar spiral array. Elevation coverage.
Scallop - Luneburg lens, with different feeder.(4 for SPO-15) Narrow beam. Angular measurement (or, splitting mixed signals) is done by directly 1 channel, with a single beam
Bulb - idk, maybe cylinder spiral array. ‘Wide’ beam. Angular measurement (or, splitting mixed signals) is done by signal processing.
All the antennas are of known type, easily checked by appearance. All these antennas have their ‘predecessors’ in SPO-15 documents, and I think there should be no other types than I pointed out in the issue page and above.
Here we go, when out of arguments, just us ad hominem and pray it works…
Prove her homo.
