your own source agrees with me
and here is a source on your beloved spiral antennas, and guess what, it also says that they have ±30° of elevation coverage
This is a cylinder spiral antenna. Learn electronics.
Please don’t leak secret documents
Which one is secret?
learn what a source is
you have nothing to show but your “deduction” (rather speculation)
you havent produced a single source that agrees with you
The Mig-29B book is downloaded from Mycity forum;
SPO-15 one is a educational metarial;
SPO-32 page from Voenmeh is public.
Source is what u accept, is it?
Calm down bro, it was just a joke
lol nvm
sure SPO-15 and SPO-32 are totally the same and lets just ignore what the manufacturer has to say about the SPO-32 just because we dont like it
Your argument
1.‘±30degs limit’ description means ‘the system can only detect signal within the limit’.
2.SPO-32 has this description.
1+2->3. SPO-32 can only detect signal within ±30degs.
I gave a counterexample to your proposition 1 from SPO-15 document, so you cannot obtain proposition 3 is true. What’s the problem?
- The disk is a antenna;
- The other type antenna cannot be fitted into the disk
- SPO-15 gave an existing example, that it’s a planar spiral antenna
1+2+3=>4. The disk is an antenna if(3) and only if(2) it’s a planar spiral antenna. - If it is, it receive signals from high elevation.
Say what ever you want. I’m busy.
IDK if you understood that, but THE SPO-32 IS NOT THE SPO-15. If you want an analogy, you cannot say that x = 1 by “saying that y = 1, therfore x = 1”. You need to specificaly demonstrate that x = 1.
Angular coverage for spo-15 is the same as l-150 at ±30. I don’t get why you’re trying to argue using spo-15.
±90 with prolongation. I have no idea what this means.
1 Like
where is that from?
seems like a book?